Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Zherefore, only one full suite analyses was conducted during 1992. <br />Chloride and Sulfate were analyzed but were omitted from the AHEt 1 <br />enclosedl. Field uarameters for August were omitted from the database as <br />well:-pFI = 7.4; EC = 195: Z+mgi C° = 14. Monitoring frequency at this <br />location should be reduced as no subsidence impacts can reasonably be <br />anticipated to effect this location. <br />SM-10: Well SM-10 is located outside the potential subsidence zone. No mining <br />which could be reasonably expected to affect this shallow aquifer has <br />taken place to date. A sufficient water quality database has been <br />established to define the pre-mining water quality at this location. <br />Therefore, only one full suite analyses was conducted during 1992. <br />Chloride and Sulfate were analyzed but were sniffed from the AHR (coov <br />enclosed). Field parameters for August were omitted from the database as <br />well: off = 7.8; F]C = 2540: 7~ C° = 17. Monitoring frequency at this <br />location should be reduced as no subsidence impacts can reasonably be <br />anticipated to effect this location. <br />SM-11: Well SM-11 is located outside the potential subsidence zone. No mining <br />which could be reasonably expected to affect this shallow aquifer has <br />taken place to date. A sufficient water quality database has been <br />established to define the pre-mining water quality at this location. <br />Zherefore, only one full suite analyses was wrrlucted during 1992. <br />well: nH = 8.6; DC = 1500; Tei[w C° = 15. Monitoring frequency at this <br />location should be reduced as no subsidence impacts can reasonably be <br />anticipated to effect this location. <br />SM-1: Well SM-1 lies adjacent to the potential subsidence zone. Mining in <br />Panels A, B, atrl C during 1991 aryl 1992 could reasonably be expec-~ted to <br />affect this shallow aquifer. A sufficient water quality database has been <br />established to define the pre-mining water quality at this location. <br />'therefore, only one full suite analyses was corrlucted during 1992. <br />Qiloride and Sulfate were analyzed but were omitted from the AHR (ooov <br />esiclosedl. Field r~arameters for August were omitted from the database as <br />well: rA-I = 8.6; F7C = 470: `I~ng~ C° = 12. Monitoring frequency at this <br />location should be reduced as sufficient baseline has been established and <br />all mining which could be anticipated to effect this aquifer has been <br />cong~leted. <br />SM-2Z: Well SM-2 is located outside the potential subsidence zone. No mini <br />which could be reasonably expected to affect this shallow aquifer has <br />taken place to date. A sufficient water quality database has been <br />established to define the pre-minim water quality at this location. <br />ttnlrrorl rrrvn rho rfaranaco ac `.rot i ~ Gr lrn tar rw = -/_H• hI' _ -4 hll! '11Fr11Rl (~~ _ <br />13. Monitoring at this location should be temporarily discontinued as no <br />subsidence impacts can reasonably be anticipated to effect this location <br />and as substantial baseline data has been collected to date. <br />SM-32: Well SM-3 is located outside the potential subsidence zone. No mining <br />which could be reasonably ~-'ted to affect this shallow aquifer has <br />13 <br />