Laserfiche WebLink
~I I~II~~II~IIIIIII <br />71ittleApplegate,lnc. <br />Consultants for Land, Mineral and Water Development <br />April 27, 1998 <br />Mr. Gregg Squire <br />Division of Minerals & Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RE: Adequacy Response, Johnson Pit; Permit M-94-007 <br />Deaz Gregg: <br />RECEIVED <br />APR 27 1998 <br />Division of Minerals 8 Geology <br />With this letter we wish to respond to your adequacy review letter of February 12, 1998. In this <br />letter you have six comments and questions. I will offer you our response in the same order. <br />Your interpretation of the grading on Exhibit C and the reclamation plan map is correct. <br />The mining grades and Exhibit F has been revised with a new contour map. You'will <br />note that the average depth of mining of the Phase 1 and 2 mining azeas are [o the 4044 <br />foot elevation. The average depth of the Phase 3 mining area are to the 4041 foot <br />elevation. Enclosed is a new Exhibi[ F. Also, you will note that there is no fill involved <br />with the reclamation plan. <br />Attached with this letter is a longitudinal profile of the reclaimed creek channel. As you <br />can see in this profile, we have maintained the same shallow channel grade as exists now. <br />As you can see in our profile, during minor rainfall events the runoff will simply fill up <br />the pit azea and then soak back to the aquifer of the creek. In major rainfall events the <br />runoff will fill up the pond and then flow out of each pit area. <br />These depressions in the creek channel will decrease the impact during a flood event. <br />2. The regrading of the reclamation plan has resulted in a downwazd slope of the pit floor to <br />a new defined creek channel in the center. Also enclosed with this letter is a section <br />through the Phase 1 and 2 mining areas. Here you will note that this area is very flat and <br />there is presently a I % gradient towazd the creek channel. Our mining has lowered this <br />situation and maintained the I % slope to a new creek channel. Side slopes are at 3:1. If <br />the pit floor was sloped at a 2% to 4% grade toward the creek channel, it would result in a <br />significant loss of sand material which could be recovered. <br />11990 Grant Street, Suite 304 • Denver, Colorado 80233 • (303) 452-6611 • Fax (303) 452-2759 <br />