Laserfiche WebLink
Memo - H. Bruce Humphries - 4 - November 16, 1989 <br />Concerns Submitted By Resolutions <br />8. Castle Concrete should pave Cedar Heights Lenders Paving access road does not <br />access road to improve drainage. significantly improve drainage and is <br />unnecessary for compliance with Board <br />Orders and the Act. <br />9. A seepage collar should be Cedar Heights Lenders The Division has asked Castle Concrete <br /> installed for Culvert No. to install anti-seep collars on all <br /> HR-3 as it is 130' long. culverts over 100 feet in length. <br />10. Proposed slope protection at Cedar Heights Lenders The Division has asked Castle Concrete <br /> culvert exits is inadequate, to provide designs for stable culvert <br /> inlet and outlet configurations. The <br /> review of the designs will be handled <br /> as a Technical Revision <br />11. Sanding chips should not be stored Cedar Heights Lenders, The Division feels the sanding chips <br /> along roadsides, but rather in the Greg M. Nagel are necessary for road maintenance <br /> quarry. If they are to be left on and should be left in accessible <br /> the road shoulders and Castle locations. Once the boulders are in <br /> places boulder behind the chip place, the chips stockpiles in front <br /> stockpiles, then the boulders will prevent machinery from pushing <br /> should be set in anchoring holes, the boulders downhill. <br />12. Berms removed along the access road Cedar Heights Lenders The Division feels uphill removal of <br /> for remedial action should not be the berms is unnecessary for <br /> pushed down onto the existing reclamation purposes. The Division <br /> disturbed slopes, but rather pulled does not feel that pushing berms <br /> uphill onto the road and removed. downhill will create new off-site <br /> d°sturbances. :~~ the ~iiiina of the <br /> inundated area at the base of Area <br /> One slide, material will need to be <br /> pushed downhill to accomplish the <br /> reclamation. <br />• <br />• <br />