Laserfiche WebLink
1 ~ • III III III III IIII III • CHARLES H LIEN PRES DENT <br />L BRUCE H LIEN CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD <br />PETE LIEN. COO <br />~.7 ROBERT J SCHURGER. E%EC VICE PRESID EN T~MANAGER <br />CRUSHED STONE • HYDRATED LIME',°~~p'~~'"~gKs¢F,ivl • OCk( PRODUCTS <br />Of/ice & Vlant located at Interstate 9PA'l~dWo~ue! <br />Box 440 <br />RAPID CITY. SOUTH DAKOTA 57709 <br />TELEPHONE: AC 605-342-7224 <br />FA X: 605-342-6979 <br />$c $ons, inc. <br />i <br />July 19, 1991 <br />Larry Oehler <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />Colorado Division of Mines <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Dem'er, Colorado 80203 <br />JUL 2 ~ 1991 <br />'firned sand <br />~` lamatiol~ Division <br />RE: Permit M-89-010 Weaver Quarry Pete Lien & Sons, Inc. <br />Our File #: 4-25-1-1 <br />Dean Mr. Oehler: <br />I would like to confirm my telephone call to you of the <br />morning of Wednesday, July 17, 1991, wherein I advised that <br />based upon information made available to me in the preceding <br />24 kiours, our company may have mined outside of the original <br />mining plan area but well within the quarter quarter section <br />authorized by the mining permit. Furthermore, the location <br />as mined is still well within the boundaries of property <br />belonging to Pete Lien & Sons, Inc. <br />i Since last visiting with you we have confirmed that in <br />facia we have inadvertently deviated from the original mining <br />r plan. The deviations extends the western most boundary of <br />the present pit approximately 300 feet to the west of what <br />was anticipated as shown on the map for Exhibit "E". I <br />believe you have now received a copy of the Larimer County <br />Plalining Commission Report and Addendum. Mr. White from <br />Lar:imer County describes this situation. <br />You should also be aware that though we have deviated <br />from the original mining plan boundary, and though we are <br />within the quarter quarter section authorized for mining by <br />the MLRD, that we have not exceeded ten acres in total <br />dis'curbance (including stock pile areas), and the mining has <br />occurred within the property included within the application <br />for expansion of the permit to a large scale regular (112) <br />operation. Thus, it would be our position that since we have <br />not deviated from the land permitted to be mined as shown on <br />Exhibit "A" of the 1989 application, no violation has <br />~~ <br />•uca. <br />