My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV15645
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV15645
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:27:01 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:07:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/1/1991
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MLRD
To
POWDERHORN COAL COMPANY
Type & Sequence
TR12
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Larry Reschke <br />November O1, 1991 <br />Paqe 3 <br />6. Revised Page 189 summarizes reclamation plans for a <br />number of roads within the permit area. In general, <br />prior to the Division issuing a decision regarding the <br />reclamation requirements of those roads, the Division <br />would need a letter from the land owner stating that it <br />is his or her desire that the road remain. Please refer <br />to Rule 2.05.5(2)(b) for the requirements on this issue. <br />Adequacy issues concerning the road reclamation plans are <br />as follows: <br />a. Please specify which portions of access roads #`2 <br />and #3 are public and will not be reclaimed. <br />b. The revised text states that "Light use Road #1 is <br />primarily other land owners' roads which are used <br />by Powderhorn. Most of this road will not be <br />removed." Please specify which portions will be <br />reclaimed. <br />Plans for the Ute water line were reviewed, and found to be <br />adequate with one exception. The plans for cover material on the <br />pipe should address Rule 4.10.4(5). Should Powderhorn elect to <br />abandon its present design plans for the water line (as was <br />discussed on October 30), the revised plans need be submitted <br />promptly to insure timely processing of this revision. The <br />Division is required to issue a decision on or before December 03, <br />1991, and would need ample time to review the amended plan. <br />The aforementioned adequacy issues must be resolved prior to the <br />Division issuing a decision on Technical Revision 12. If you have <br />any questions or are in need of additional information, please call <br />me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~7,co,~,~ Ci'~~~~-~-. <br />Susan L Morrison <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />cc: US Bureau of Land Management, <br />Grand Junction Resource Area <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.