Laserfiche WebLink
~~: ~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ~ <br />i <br />APR - 7 1978 <br />~ CASTLE CONCRETE PERMIT APPLICATION 4~9~!~D IF,iVt~ RECi.A"fATION <br />CASTLE SAND PIT 77-213 Cale. Gent. of ^!atur2! h esc_rces <br />EVANS & BRIGGS ATTORNEYS' COMMENTS <br />~ SECOND SUPPLEMENT <br />APRIL 1978 <br />1. Castle Concrete Company has affected no new lands I <br />since July 1, 1973. Therefore, all the land included within the <br />mining plan maps, C1 and C2, should be included. <br />2. (a) Fertilizer application is included on reclamation '. <br />plan map, Exhibit "F", and also on Exhibit "L" (confidential recla- <br />mation costs). Attached hereto is a Castle Sand Pit Exhibit "1" <br />a <br />which is a soil test report of March 21, 1978, of two tests by <br />Colorado State University at Fort Collins, Colorado. No recom- ~ <br />mended fertilizer was given, but further inquiries are being made ~ <br />as to that issue. ~ <br />(b) As I am sure you observed from your visits that <br />the type of soil material from the Sand Plant will be 200 minus <br />fines and based on the growth observed at the Sand Plant Castle <br />~ would feel that this is an adequate type of soil for a growth '. <br />medium, Historical experience has indicated that the fines ~ <br />removed from the Sand Plant will support plant life. A good <br />example of this is a large sediment pond at the Sand Plant, your <br />application number 77-213. Plant life, foliage and trees can be <br />seen from the pond on the aerial photo of this operation. Sand <br />fines of those materials are passed through a minus 200 seive. <br />-1- <br />~~ <br />