Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Michael Long <br />May 16, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology inspection comments <br />The following arc comments about the B pit, i.e. northwest A pit, from the backfilling and <br />grading sections of inspection reports: <br />Inspection date Insncciur Comments <br />9-7-94 SLB no problems noted <br />9-14-94 ESC no problems noted <br />10-28-94 SLB Reclamation operations were nearly complete on the norihwestem <br /> portion of the A pit. The final highwall had been blasted, graded, and <br /> covered with topsoil....The reclaimed topography appeared to be in <br /> compliance with approved post mine contours and blended well with <br /> existing slopes. <br />I I-8-94 ESC Northwest portion of the A pit appears to be complete and blends in <br /> well with the existing topography. <br />1-4-95 SLB Final grading was complete on the upper l/3 of the pit. <br />3-31-95 DTM measured final drainage--no specific enforcement actions <br />(r21-95 WHE backfilled azea settled.. section 006-NEl appears as a gully 24 to 36 <br /> inches deep and needs maintenance. <br />9-14-95 LPR ...it appears impacts to undisturbed areas could be n+inimi~ed by <br /> continuing to direct runoff dawn the road ditch and down the rock <br /> lined channel on the reclaimed B pit. <br />9-27-95 SLB ...one other item of wncem is the constructed channel which runs <br /> roughly parallel to the reclaimed highwalL...the operator should look <br /> into this discrepancy, and inform the division... <br />NOV issued 10-16-95 <br />10-19-95 ESC ...no erosion features were noted in this backfilled area. <br />