My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV14550
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV14550
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:25:45 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:53:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/23/1986
Doc Name
Letter and Findings Document
From
MLRD
To
KERR COAL CO
Type & Sequence
RN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-5- <br />The entire outcrop and sub-crop of the Sudduth Coal seam in the mine plan and <br />adjacent areas comprises the recharge area for the coal seam. Snow melt <br />provides the majority of the recharge to the coal seam. The estimated <br />recharge over the entire coal seam was calculated to be 4.75 acre ft/y r. No <br />wells are located in the Sudduth Coal seam, and there is only one discharge <br />point in the area, a spring at the Old Sudduth Mine located in Section 15, <br />T9N, R78W. This spring does not provide sufficient discharge to be considered <br />a significant water source. There have been no other observed springs or <br />seeps from the Sudduth Coal seam in the adjacent area. <br />The Sudduth Coal seam does not appear to discharge to or be recharged by the <br />alluvium of Williams and Bush Draws. This is evident from water table <br />elevations (Map 15a and Table 8a of the original permit application) which are <br />lower in the coal seam than in adjacent alluvial wells. <br />Hoffstra, who conducted aquifer tests in the overburden, reported permeability <br />values of 0.37 gpd/ft2 in unfaulted overburden, and 7.5 gpd /f t2 near <br />faulted areas. These values indicate that the overburden is essentially a <br />confining unit, but approaches a semi-confining state in areas of secondary <br />permeability. <br />The Upper Coalmont Formation, which is located near the axis of the Johnny <br />Moore Syncline, contains limited perched aquifers. These perched systems <br />typically consist of lenticular channel sands, usually less than thirty feet <br />thick. <br />Kerr Coal Company conducted an aquifer test on the underburden (upper Pierre <br />Shale) near the mine site. From this test, the permeability of the <br />underburden was calculated to be 0.15 qod/ft2. In addition, a Sudduth Coal <br />seam observation well located 20 feet ~vay from the test hole showed no <br />drawdown during pumping of the test hole. This data indicates that the Pierre <br />Shale is a confining unit that transmits little water. The test also <br />demonstrates that the Sudduth Coal is not hydraulically connected to the <br />underlying Pierre Shale. <br />The Sudduth Coal seam, underburden and overburden units of the open Pit No. 3 <br />are in hydrologic communication with the alluvium of Sudduth Draw. The bottom <br />of open Pit No. 3 will be 120 feet below the level of Sudduth Draw. The pit <br />will be dewatered during mining. These factors will produce an increased <br />ground water gradient for flow from Sudduth Draw towards the pit, resulting in <br />a depletion of flow in Sudduth Draw. This depletion can be minimized by <br />decreasing the infiltration over the sub-crop in Sudduth Draw. Two stock <br />ponds, one upstream and one over the sub-crop, exist on Sudduth Draw. These <br />ponds increase the amount and the length of time that surface waters can <br />infiltrate the alluvium, as is evident from the sub-irrigated area below the <br />ponds. Water, which is allowed to infiltrate through the ponds upstream and <br />over the sub-crop area, will be lost to beneficial use in the immediate area <br />and downstream during and after mining the northern section of Pit No. 3. To <br />resolve this concern, the following stipulation was necessary: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.