REV13742

• Permit No: C1984065
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 4/10/2001
• Doc Name: MEMO REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE OF MR 16 VEGETATION SAMPLING
• From: DMG
• To: FN C-84-065 MR 16
• Type & Sequence: MR16
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

C-84-065 MR 16
C:\WPDOCS\CoalRidge\MR 16Compliance Review65.doc
Page 3 of 4
The application is in compliance with this rule. A cover sheet to the application correctly identifies
the permit as C-81-025.
*Rule 2.08.4(5)(b) A specific description of the requested change in the terms of the permit;
The application is in compliance with this rule. Revised pages to the permit provide a description
of the requested changes in the terms of the permit.
*Rule 2.08.4(5)(c) A specific description of any changes in the mining and reclamation operation
which mny hreve an effect an performance bond requirements of Rule 3; and
The application is in compliance with this rule. There is no effect on the performance bond
requirements. The cover sheet of the application indicates no change.
*Rule 2.08.4(5)(d) Such other information as mny be necessary jot the Division to determine if the
proposed revision will cotrtply wish the Act and these Rules. The Board or Division mny reasonably
request additional information to evaluate the proposed revision.
The application is in compliance with this rule. Information in the application is complete.
Rule 2.08.4(6)(c)(ii) Within 10 days after the filing of a complete application for a minor
revision, the Division shall issue a decision approving or denying the application in whole or in
part. A written copy of the decision shall be promptly provided to the permittee and shall be
posted in the Division office.
A proposed decision date of March 27, 2001 was posted on March 26, 2001. A written copy of
the proposed decision was sent to the permittee by Division letter of March 27, 2001.
Rule 2.08.4(6)(c)(iii) Within ]0 days after the notification required by 2.08.4(5)(c)(ii) above, any
person which has an interest which is or may be adversely affected may request a formal hearing
on the decision by the Division. Such request shall be in writing and state with reasonable
specificity the reasons for the request and objections to the Division. If so requested, the formal
hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of 2.07.4(3).
The public notice of Rule 2.08.4(6)(c)(ii) above was posted until April 9, 2001. There were no
comments in response to the public notice.
Rule 4.15.5(2) /n no case shall grazing be allowed to preclude or interfere with postntining
vegetation sampling ns required in 4.15.8.
Grazing had been permitted on the reclaimed areas. However, results still compared favorably