My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV13052
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV13052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:24:02 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:38:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/10/1992
Doc Name
TR-59 PN C-80-007 ADEQUACY REVIEW WEST ELK MINE
From
MLRD
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
Type & Sequence
TR59
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Welt <br />Page 2 <br />7. The response is acceptable to the Division, <br />8. Although this information is outdated and new data is provided <br />in the Annual Hydrology Report (AHR), the data still should be <br />contained within the permit document as it shows a historical <br />record. <br />9. Although this information is outdated and new data is provided <br />in the Annual Hydrology Report (AHR), the data still should be <br />contained within the permit document as it shows a historical <br />record. <br />l0. The response is acceptable to the Division. <br />11. The response is acceptable to the Division. Please provide <br />the revised pages. <br />12. The response is acceptable to the Division. Please provide <br />the revised pages. <br />13. The response is acceptable to the Division. Please provide <br />the revised pages. <br />14. The response is acceptable to the Division. <br />15. Although this information is outdated and new data is provided <br />in the AHR, this data should be contained within the permit <br />document as it is part of a historical record. <br />16. The response is acceptable to the Division. <br />17. The response is acceptable to the Division. <br />18. The response is acceptable to the Division. Please provide <br />the revised pages. <br />19. Why is the information on page 2-504 outdated? This data is <br />considered historic and should be included. If Mountain Coal <br />Company no longer maintains the Horse Creek Rain Gaqe, please <br />provide an explanation. <br />20. The response is acceptable to the Division. Please provide <br />the revised pages. <br />21. The information on page 2-561 has~icontained in the new <br />document on page 2.05140. The table which you have inserted as <br />Table 60, is also contained in the new document as Table 74. The. <br />Division would like to insert the information on page 258'1 and 2.05-9~ <br />delete the information from page 2.05-140, as these pages relate ~Ccrac~ <br />more to runoff from disturbed areas than to Springs. Please note ~ ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.