Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ~ <br />N _~~ -.tow <br />hearing,,on the possible violations be schedul d so as to follow <br />the hear.~g on permit amendment application is nenied. <br />The Board hall hold a hearing i~E this matter concerning possible <br />violations prior to continuing the hearing concerning :.he permit <br />amendment. <br />5. The motion by Castle Concrete Company to c:ontinue <br />this matter concerning the possible violations beyond the August <br />1989 Board Meeting is denied. The hearing on possible violations <br />shall be held at the August 1989 meeting as scheduled. <br />6. PROCEDURE <br />The following order of presentation shall govern the hear- <br />ing. The Board has the right to limit any redundant or repeti- <br />tive testimony. <br />a. Presentation of evidence by the Division, fol- <br />lowed by: <br />1j Cross-examination of -ivision witnesses <br />by Castle Concrete; <br />2) Cross-examination of Divis.'.on witnesses <br />by the parties in the order listed in paragraph 1. <br />b. Presentation of evidence by Castle Concrete, <br />followed by: <br />1) Cross-examination by the Division; <br />2j Cross-examination by each of the parties <br />in the order listed in paragraph 1. <br />c. Presentation of evidence by th+a parties in the <br />order listed in paragraph 1; each party's presentation shall be <br />followed by: <br />1) Cross-examination by then Division; <br />2) Cross-examination by Cantle Concrete. <br />d. Rebuttal evidence by Castle Concrete; <br />e. Rebuttal evidence by the Div.~sion; <br />f. Closing arguments in the following order: <br />-2- <br />