Laserfiche WebLink
• Selected water quality data obtained by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) and <br />IVECC were reviewed to estimate the water quality of the North Fork during low <br />flow periods. The data reviewed consisted of 15 sampling events conducted by the <br />USGS during the October 1981 -September 1982 water year (provided in Attachment <br />1), the most recent quarterly sampling conducted by WECC on October Il, 1985 <br />(provided in Attachment 2) and graphical representations of data for 1983 produced by <br />IVECC (provided in Attachment 3). The data reviewed are summarized in Table L <br />The lowest flow volume in the North fork normally occurs during the months of <br />October through February. Water quality data obtained for the remaining months <br />during which flows are generally in excess of 100 efs were not reviewed for the <br />purpose of this analysis, nor are they presented in Table 1. <br />Water quality for most parameters in the North Fork is generally better during <br />periods of low flow than during high flow because of much lower turbidity during low <br />tlow. Typical values approximately the average of the low flow data reviewed were <br />estimated and are shown n Table I. Most parameters are well below tl~e ISS during <br />low flow periods. Ammonia is typically found at a concentration of about 0.15 mg/1 in <br />comparison with the ISS of 0.2 mg/1. The measured concentration of ammonia <br />• occasionally exceeds the ISS both upstream and downstream of the refuse pile. <br />Cadmium and mercury are parameters which also have existing concentrations near <br />the ISS. The ISS for mercury has been set at a concentration below the detectable <br />measurement ability of most analytical laboratories. Detection limits reported in the <br />data reviewed for this analysis ranged from 4 to 200 times greater than the ISS. For <br />this reason, it is not possible to accurately estimate the existing background <br />concentration of mercury in the North Fork in relation to the ISS. <br />Data for some o[ the parameters which have ISS were not available. These included <br />residual chlorine, hexavalent chromium, cyanide, dissolved manganese, nitrite, silver <br />and sulfide. Residual chlorine is set to regulate the discharge of treated sewage <br />effluent and is not a parameter of concern when considering the impacts of the <br />refuse leachate. Discussions with CIIILRD indicate cyanide is not expected to be a <br />parameter of concern based on their experience at other sites. Silver is very <br />insoluble and is not expected to leach at significant concentration from the refuse. <br />Sulfide and nitrite, which are reduced chemical species, are expected to convert to <br />oxidized ionic forms after mixing with the North Fork water which is high in <br />• dissolved oxygen. Hexavalent chromium and dissolved manganese were assumed to be <br />at the same concentration as trivalent chromium and total manganese respectively, <br />adding to the already high degree of conservatism incorporated in the analysis. <br />,. <br />