My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV12567
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV12567
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:23:32 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:34:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/7/1994
Doc Name
WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-007 PERMIT REVISION 05 ROUND TWO ADEQUACY REVIEW RESPONSES
From
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
PR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mountain Coal Company <br />West Elk Mine <br />Post Office Box 591 <br />Somerset, Cobrado 81434 <br />Telephone 303929-5015 <br />Fax 303 929-5595 <br />October 03, 1994 <br />Ms. Christine E. Johnston <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br />1313 Sherman Street Room 215 <br />RFCEIUED <br />OCT 07'i9~ <br />iii iiiiiiiiuiii iii <br />999 <br />~~ <br />pivislon or ~aurerais s Geology <br />/~~eu/ <br />Denver, CO 80203 ~ ~f v <br />Re: West Elk Mine, Permit No. C-80-007, Permit Revision No. O5, Round Two Adequacy <br />Review Responses <br />Dear Christine: <br />Mountain Coal Company (MCC) has reviewed the Division's remaining and additional adequacy <br />concerns on the Jumbo Mountain Permit Revision application, per your letter of July O5, 1994, <br />and considering our discussions during our meeting at the Division offices on July 14, ]994, MCC <br />provides the following responses. These responses are presented in the same order as the <br />Division's questions. <br />Site Description and Land Use (2.04.3) <br />' 1. No response required. <br />Cultural and Historic Resources <br />1. No response required. <br />2. The final report for Exhibit lOB has since been forwarded to the Division and SHPO as <br />required. MCC understands that the SHPO had no concems with the findings. <br />~~~,~ copy ~i- f;~fl%~ ,..,CU.,;vJ c.c- ~' :.. .. , <br />Geology 2.04.6 ~ _~ , ' - ~ ~ ' /~ <br />~. 1. No response required. <br />~' ~'2. No response required. <br />~ ~ 3. Page 2.04-33 has been revised to include a statement to differentiate faults from fractures. <br />4. As the interval mined by MCC is within the B seam(i.e. the roof is B seam and the floor is <br />B seam), MCC believes that the sulfur analyses completed on the B seam and provided to the <br />_ J;-.~ <br />~>.. i. ~, <br />• r ~ .. / . , <br />r: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.