Laserfiche WebLink
Adequacy Letter - TR 65 <br />September 17, 1993 <br />Page 7 <br />The Division would request that the estimate identify the <br />location of the culvert, and not only a cumulative length for <br />each culvert size. If MCC should revise the location or size, <br />and/or add culverts, the change should be included in the <br />estimate and marked on the appropriate drawings. <br />5. With the exception of the light-use road around MB-2R, road <br />reclamation cannot be included as part of pond earthwork. <br />Reclamation for the light-use road at the base of the refuse <br />pile, the relocated and new access roads will be estimated as <br />separate tasks. The task sheets for road reclamation are <br />attached and are summarized as follows: <br />Push gravel from lower roads into MB-2R $ 796.00 <br />Push gravel from lower roads into MB-3 $ 400.00 <br />Rip new light-use and access roads S 269.00 <br />TOTAL $1465.00 <br />6. The Division has estimated there is 980 feet of guardrail that <br />must be removed for reclamation. Guardrail was assumed to be <br />along the light-use road on the south side of MB-2R, along the <br />relocated access road, and on the new access road to MB-3. <br />7. The Division believes some additional structures in task 43 <br />can be eliminated as they have been removed or replaced. They <br />are as follows: <br />*MB-3 ditch inlet 24" CMP (Page 4) $ 425.00 <br />(replaced with a 30" CMP) <br />*MB-6 discharge extension CMP (Page 4) $2164.00 <br />(now MB-2R and discharge structure is a 48" CMP) <br />8. The bond liability following Technical Revision No. 64 was <br />$4,396,360.00 which left a surplus of $3,640.00. See <br />Attachment C included in a Division letter associated with <br />Technical Revision No. 64 dated August 27, 1993. The <br />liability also included removal of the office trailers. <br />MISCELLANEOUS PAGE CHANGES <br />1. The riparian buffer zone figure is not on revised page 2.05- <br />56. This figure should be forwarded to the Division. <br />2. Table 9 in Exhibit 51 should be changed to reflect that 1.05 <br />feet is the depth required for the south ditch during Phase <br />IV. <br />3. Why did the total acres disturbed for Phase IV on Table 11 of <br />Exhibit 51 increase from 23.6 to 32.17 acres? <br />