Laserfiche WebLink
24,1998 -2- 983-2348.195 <br />In November, 1997, one test pit was excavated within the general area of the proposed <br />intermediate haul road using a Case 2080 trackhoe operated by Conley Construction of <br />Cripple Creek, Colorado. Results of this test pitting program compared quite well with the <br />results of the investigation program conducted in 1993 for the Ironclad Overburden Storage <br />Facility (Golder Associates, 1993. Report on Ironclad Rock Storage Area Stability, <br />Cresson Project, October). Soils were found to reach thicknesses in excess of 15 feet <br />along the valley floor and generally consisted of cobbles, gravel and sand in a silty clay <br />matrix overlain by a topsoil layer. <br />Based on visual observation of material encountered in the test pit, Golder has used the <br />same material properties in this analyses as those presented in the earlier analysis <br />performed by Golder (Golder, 1993.). The following material properties were used for the <br />slope stability evaluation: <br />- :::.:::.......: :::::::Unit:':.:::. <br />....... ;:-:'SaEurated::':`: ::Ertctot:An le.: :'::.:Co~esiho-::: <br />......:...:.....:..............: . <br />Weighf..:. <br />::::Unit.!Weight.:: <br />`:':., ;..: <br />:::: _.' <br />.:~ <br />: <br />: <br />: <br />.:; ':::;:: c: ;:::::::::: <br /> <br />.::Material:.Type:: <br />:.:..(1?~ ::.:. <br />:::::::::(pefj;':'::: ' :: . <br />. <br />. <br />.. <br />............ <br />:':..: (ae ~~::::.:;: . <br />:: .:....:.. . <br />.: '::.:':.(psi ::.:.::: <br />Mine Overburden 120 130 39 0 <br />Foundation Soils 110 120 29 0 <br />Bedrock 120 120 40 1000 <br />The primary potential failure mode considered in this stability analysis consisted of a block <br />or wedge failure through the foundation soils below the overburden material. While <br />circular surfaces are also possible, this potential failure mode typically consists of shallow <br />surface raveling, whereas the wedge failures would involve large intact blocks of the <br />overburden material translating horizontally. Therefore, the wedge failure mode was <br />considered more critical for this application because it would involve significant volumes of <br />displaced material, while the surficial slope raveling represents only relatively small slope <br />adjustments affecting small amounts of overburden material. <br />The static factor of safety (FOS) associated with deep seated movements along Section A- <br />A' was computed to be 1.2. Apseudo-static FOS of 1.0 was calculated for a peak ground <br />acceleration of 0.088. The section was developed based on the following configuration: <br />overburden material (placed at a 1.8H:1V sideslope) would be placed on a 10 foot thick <br />layer of foundation soils which overlay a competent foundation material. As the base <br />topography represents the top of a ridge where groundwater is not usually encountered, no <br />phreatic surface was used in the analysis. The static FOS for deep seated movements along <br />Section B-B' was computed to be 1.4. Apseudo-static FOS of 1.2 was calculated for a <br />peak ground acceleration of O.O8g. This section was taken along the low point of the <br />drainage, and was based on the following configuration: overburden material (placed at a <br />1.SH:1V sideslope) would be placed on 10 feet of foundation soils which overlay a <br />competent foundation material. As this was the low point of the drainage where <br />I:\98\aa8\2]a8pJ1a.I,TR Golder ASSOCiaTes <br />