Laserfiche WebLink
(Deposition of James Tatum) <br />1 A. This is the letter that I sent in <br />2 response t o this proposed agreement. <br />3 q. So, Exhibit 30 is in response to <br />4 Exhibit 29 ? <br />5 A. Yes, sir. <br />6 Q. Para graph two of Exhibit 30, describes <br />7 one of the terms or a portion of the terms of the <br />8 June 1st, 1988, letter agreement, which is still <br />9 somewhere there in front of you, if you want to <br />10 look at it . Is that a fair statement? <br />11 A. I di dn't understand the question. <br />12 Q. Let me try again. Is paragraph two B <br />13 in Exhibit 30 a statement of a portion of the terms <br />14 set forth in the June 1st, 1989, letter agreement. <br />15 A. My understanding of what was done, <br />16 2-B. <br />17 Q. Do you have the June 1st agreement in <br />18 front of you? <br />19 A. Yes. <br />20 Q. Is it fair to say that paragraph 2-B <br />21 vas not a repudiation of the portion of the June <br />22 1st letter agreement which states that, "This trade <br />23 of the Maxwell water right will not include a <br />~ 24 transfer of the water rights priority numbers --" <br />25 you weren't attempting to repudiate that portion of <br />MEEK & ASSOCIATES <br />3016 3rd Ave., Pueblo, Co 81008 (719) 542-1010 <br />28 <br />