My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE23302
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE23302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:40 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:23:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
8/29/1994
Doc Name
NEW ELK MINE PN C-81-012 NOV C-94-18 C-94-19 & C-94-20
From
BASIN RESOURCES INC
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1994020
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PAGE 4 <br />event. The probability of a storm of this magnitude occurring is <br />less than once in ten years. Although the capacity was reduced on <br />the ditches and culverts, any additional flow which would occur <br />would still report to sediment ponds. These structures were <br />designed per regulation, to handle capacities from storm events up <br />to a 10 year/24 hour. The design event was surpassed. All <br />structures. except two culverts were returned to their design <br />capacities prior to departure of the inspection team on August 12. <br />Clean-out of the other two culverts .was done before the abatement <br />deadline. ,Seriousness is extremely low due to the nature of the <br />event that caused the problems, tshort.dhrationi?and limi`ted~actual _ <br />and potential damage which may have occurred. <br />FAULT: The unavoidable nature of the storm event, combined <br />with the very quick response time to correct the identified areas <br />indicate a very low fault value. Response time was delayed because <br />~ of the extremely wet conditions and the labor'diapute which did not <br />'. allow a continuation of cleanup. Cleanup of, the drainage system <br />was. well underway at'.the time. of inspection. It continued <br />throughou£.the .inspection.. .The .cleanup was progressing 'in a <br />priority fashion with there secondary structures awaiting their <br />turn. The failure to maintain was a direct result of'the total <br />disruption of..the drainage system caused by the storm.. <br />GOOD' FAITH: All but two culverts were completely_.cleaned <br />prior to departure of the inspection team. All ditches were <br />returned to design capacity. Completion of the clean out of the <br />two remaining culverts was done by August 13 for one and August 17 <br />for the second. Both were finished within the abatement deadline <br />date. Repair work was well underway upon your 'arrival, all <br />'ditches and moat culverts returned to design capacity, and .the two <br />'remaining culverts par.tially~restored prior to inspection team <br />departure: .Good .faith.cr~dit should be at the maximum. <br />NOV C-94-020: Failure to Maintain Pond Primary Spillway <br />Structures . <br />SERIOUSNESS: The extent of .actual or potential damage caused <br />by this NOV is extremely low. The primary spillway for, pond '008 ' <br />had a leaking riser. This riser has never leaked prior to the . <br />riiajor storm event because the water level in the pond has never <br />been up that height. The increased water elevation was caused_by <br />the major storm. The amount of water leaking ie minimal.. .The <br />water is absorbed into the -ground prior to reaching the -CDPS <br />sampling location. In. other. words, there was no regulated <br />discharge. The gate valve leak at .pond 007 was also dripping a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.