Laserfiche WebLink
PAGE 3 <br />2) The area under the RDA belt on the south bank of the river <br />concerns the drainage area directly under the belt, an area of <br />0.003 acres. The amount of runoff contributed to this area is <br />minimal. Repairs to the board structure were completed by August <br />12 . ' <br />' 3) The site east of the coal silos includea:a disturbed area. <br />of approximately 0.6 acres. Drainage escaped this area due to the <br />overflow of culverts and ditches in the area. These ditches <br />overflowed due. to the exceedance of their required design capacity.' <br />' This area was.se~aired anct functional by Auguet~'19. <br />i <br />'~ 4) The reno mattress drainage on the west side of the RDA <br />overflowed due to the shifting of the rock in one of the <br />mattresses. The shifting was caused by the intensity of the rain. . <br />' This caused runoff to escape along a roadway toward the highway., <br />'During the intense. period of the ra}n storm, a temporary diversion <br />dam.and ditch was constructed to divert 'the runoff toward the RDA <br />pond. This 'reduced .the off site runoff to approximately l.hou;'s <br />worth of drainage during. the storm... <br />j - ~ ~ -~'~FAULT: All.iEema,~in this alleged :violation resulted from the <br />f intense rain which was,greate= than 'a.'10 year/'24 fioui,event: The. <br />i structures were 'designed' and conatruated. to handle a:10 gear[24 <br />'' hour. event in. accordance. with the New Elk Mine: permit and <br />f " applicable regulation's'. With the ezceedance of this amount..of . <br />rain, the structures overflowed. Combine the intensity of the <br />_ event with the volume of rain and the results were devastating to ' <br />the drainage systems. Failure to• meet the cited .performance <br />standards was unavoidable despite the exercise of .reasonable care. <br />There should be no fault attributed to this NOV. _ - <br />GOOD' FAITH:. :Basin: has worked diligently and continuously <br />since the ma~br event to restore 'the drainage system to proper <br />• order. .Except. for a labor dispute over the weekend at the mine <br />which prevented cleanup anti repair crews .from entering the mine <br />' site, work has proceeded with all equipment and manpower available. <br />-All items on this violation were repaiied to prevent further off <br />site discharges either before arrival or before departure of the <br />inspection.team on August 12, 1994. In the case of the reno <br />~mattresa drainage, temporary repairs were done during the storm. <br />Good"faith should be. at a maximum. <br />NOV C-94'-019: Failure to Maintain Ditches .and Culverts. <br />SERIOUSNESS: The structures identified filled with materials <br />as a result of the intense storm which exceeded the 10 year/24 hour <br />