My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV11517
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV11517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:22:29 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:23:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/30/2002
Doc Name
Response Letter
From
DMG
To
Energy Fuels Mining Company
Type & Sequence
RN4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLOlZADO <br />DIVISION Of MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1373 Sherman SL, Room 275 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 1303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8706 <br />October 30, 2002 <br />George Patterson <br />Energy Fuels Mining Company <br />P.O. Box 449 <br />Florence, CO 81226 <br />Re: Review of Adequacy Responses <br />Raton Creek Mines (Permit No. C-82-055) <br />Permit Renewal No. 4 (PR- 04) <br />Dear Mr. Patterson: <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Acting Division Director <br />The Division has completed review of responses received the permit application for renewal of <br />the coal mining permit for the Raton Creek mine. Please respond to any comments or issues <br />as necessary considering a decision deadline of June 25, 2002. <br />Response accepted. <br />2. Response accepted. <br />3. Page 22 of section 2.03 incorrectly identifies the mine as the Southfield Mine. Also, <br />effective dates for the DMG permit and the NPDES permit should be updated. Please <br />update section 2.03.10 (page 22) regarding other licenses and permits. <br />4. Response accepted. <br />Additional issues of September 5, 2002 <br />The Division has reviewed the SEDCAD+ documentation submitted in response to the <br />question of pond performance and water quality estimates with regard to sediment <br />loading. Based on these estimates, it appears that the as-built configuration of the <br />sediment pond is adequate for effective sediment control and water quality treatment. <br />Please ensure that storm discharges are sampled on an opportunistic basis. The <br />Division will attempt to collect a sample should the opportunity present itself during an <br />inspection visit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.