My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-04-26_REVISION - M1978056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978056
>
2004-04-26_REVISION - M1978056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:45:09 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:18:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/26/2004
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Varra Companies Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Russian olive is no longer a desired species in Colorado. Locust and Plumb, along with Russian <br />olive, was planted in the mid 1980's by the previous operator as a screen along the South <br />boundary, at the request of Weld County, Colorado. We believe the necessary extent of this <br />commitment is completed and there is no basis to believe reclamation will be enhanced by <br />subsequent plantings. W e have no plans to continue the planting of trees. The post mine <br />development of site will be a better gage as to the desirability of such a commitment. <br />18. Please indicate whether VCI will continue to maintain and commit to a 100 foot buffer <br />between the reclaimed pond edge and the top of bank for the Cache La Poudre river. <br />This commitment was retained, as evidenced and measurable in the included Exhibit C - Pre- <br />Mining and Mining Plan Map. Reclamation efforts were made over the previous year to assure <br />this commitment, and is reflected on Exhibit C -Mining Plan Map. This commitment is also <br />affirmed under page 4 of Exhibit L -Reclamation Costs -Water. <br />6.4.6 EXII131T F -Reclamation Plan Mao <br />19. The elevations noted on the Exhibit F -Reclamation Plan Map aze not readable. Please <br />provide a reclamation plan map with clear and readable elevations and/or contours. <br />The elevations are limited by the scale of the operation. The elevations shown on Exhibit F - <br />Reclamation Plan Map aze two (2) foot contours. To increase the size of the numbers on the map <br />would make them lazger than the adjacent contours. We propose to blow up a representative <br />segment for reference elevations, or otherwise create some manner of reference elevations on <br />outlying contours from which the two (2) foot contours could be counted. If this will satisfy the <br />Division, the necessary revision to the Exhibit F map will be made. <br />6.4.7 Eabibit G -Water Information <br />20. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7, please provide a statement of whether the operation is or is not <br />expected to duectly affect surface or groundwater systems. (The Division anticipates that the <br />groundwater system in the affected land and surrounding area will be duectly affected since at <br />least 125 acres will be de-watered to an average depth of at least 25 feet and dry mined). Please <br />respond. <br />The significance of any impacts from past dewatering have not evidenced themselves in 20 yeazs <br />of operations. The potential for impact was analyzed by C.G.R.S. Based upon this analysis and <br />historic conditions, impacts to surface or groundwater systems are not anticipated. This is <br />supported by approval of a Substitute Supply Plan by the Office of the State Engineer. <br />Impacts to the floodway remain under assessment by Anderson Consulting of Fort Collins, <br />Colorado. While impacts to this stream segment are alleged, the actual determination of impacts <br />is pending. if impacts are found, any necessary corrective action determined by the consulting <br />engineer will, as applied, restore integrity to assure such impacts aze not sustained. <br />21. Tn accordance with Rule 6.4.7(2xb), please identify and characterize the known aquifer to be <br />de-watered and dry mined. Please include the average or the expected range of groundwater <br />depth below the ground surface, assuming natural and non-disturbed conditions. Please respond. <br />Varna Companies, Inc. MI978-056 Durham Sand & Gravel Pit - 2003 Amendment - 10 <br />Monday 26 April 2004 reply to correspondence from the Colorado Division of <br />Minerals and Geology of 6 January 2004. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.