My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22972
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:18:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/28/1994
Doc Name
C-81-018 NOV C-93-156 COMPACTION TESTING PILOT STUDY WASTE PILE 4
From
DMG
To
BARBARA PAVLIK
Violation No.
CV1993156
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PAGE 2 <br />FEBRUARY 10, 1993 <br />BARBARA PAVLIK <br />Page III-44 of the permit addresses the installation o1 the radio repeater site. Page IV-47 mentions <br />that '... various facilities were constructed in a Cashion similar to the parking lots'. Sediment is <br />controlled by a berm constructed in response to a DMG order during a field inspection. Copies of <br />pages III-44 and IV-47 are attached. <br />Page IV-16 of the permit addresses the transfer stations (belt turnover areas). A copy of this page <br />is attached. <br />Maps 109, 111 and 112 show the staging and laydown areas and the slot storage area. Page IV-55 <br />of the permit addresses runoff control along the conveyors and in the slot storage area. A wpy of <br />this page is attached. <br />The degas wells and sump dewatering holes should be treated as any other drill hole as far as the <br />surface disturbance is concerned. Page III-36 of the permit addresses the runoff control from such <br />areas during and after drilling. A copy of this page is attached. <br />As suggested by the Assessment Officer, WFU is willing to work with DMG on this small area <br />exemption issue as an 'administrative oversight' issue. WFU will submit the currently required <br />'demonstration of effluent quality' within 30 days of a formal request from DMG identifying the areas <br />requiring such demonstration. <br />This NOV has been stayed by the Assessment Officer. WFU has complied with the first requirement <br />of the NOV by submitting a plan to test the existing RP-4 refuse pile, and the policy for future <br />compaction testing. Table I shows the results of the pilot test conducted to detect any bias between <br />the Troxler reading before and after digging the refuse surface with a dozer. Six locations were <br />tested. Locations 1, 2 and 3 were tested at a depth of six feet. Locations 5, 6 and 7 were tested <br />at a depth of three feet. Readings were taken between the dozer tracts, on the dozer tracks, in the <br />badchoe trench (6' deep) and on the sidewalls (3' deep). The Troxler nuclear density meter read <br />an erroneously high percentage of moisture. The in-place dry density was corrected for moisture, <br />as recommended by Troxler, by determining the actual moisture content of the refuse material in the <br />lab. Earlier, two samples of refuse going to RP-4 were collected and sent to Lincoln-Devoie for the <br />determination of the maximum dry density. The results obtained were 89.9 and 90.1 Ibs/cubic ft. <br />Copies of Lincoln-Devoie's reports are also enclosed with this letter. The percentage compaction <br />has been computed to vary between 105.9% to 109.0% of the maximum dry density. The <br />compaction data are well above the minimum requirement of 90 percent. Although this was a pilot <br />test, the results show compaction well above the requirement, therefore, WFU requests that these <br />~e~h G <br />-~yru at. <br />`/ ~~~~ <br />~./> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.