My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV10470
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV10470
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:16:06 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:12:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/27/1998
Doc Name
PH II/III BRA EXHIBIT 1
From
VEGETATION STUDY FOR FINAL BOND RELEASE
Type & Sequence
SL3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
for the 1996 and 1997 studies aze plotted on the maps included N Appendix F. <br />Representative photographs of the reclaimed study area are shown in Appendix C. <br />5.1 Sample Site Locations <br />All sampling points are plotted on the maps provided in Appendix F. These <br />include the cover, production, and shrub density sample sites. <br />5.2 Cover <br />Cover data by plant species, life-form, and ground cover class for the 1996, <br />revised 1996, 1996 non-contiguous areas, 1997, and 1997 non-contiguous areas are <br />shown in Tables la, lb, lc, ld, and le, respectively. Field data sheets are included in <br />Appendix B. <br />1996 Data <br />Overall highest absolute vegetation cover for the original 1996 (Table la) data was <br />observed on the Chokecherry reference area followed by the Aspen reference area, <br />reclamation azea, Oak Brush reference area and the Sagebrush reference area. Absolute <br />total ground cover was highest for the reclamation azea followed by the Aspen reference <br />azea, Chokecherry reference area, Oak Blush reference area, and the Sagebrush reference <br />area. Vegetation cover on both the reclaimed and reference aeeas were dominated by <br />perennial grasses. The original 1996 data showed that the reclaimed area had higher cover <br />of perennial grasses while all the reference areas exhibited a higher cover of perennial <br />forbs. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.