My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV10252
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV10252
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:13:10 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986076
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/17/1995
Doc Name
FOLLOW UP REVIEW COMMENTS INCAS MINE AMENDMENT AM-002 PN M-86-076
From
DMG
To
DEADWOOD GULCH MINING CO
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />In regard to the portion of the response indicating that "any <br />instability of the surface open cute will be remedied with <br />waste rock obtainable from the talus elopes of Junction Creek <br />Sandstone on the top of the affected mining area", such an <br />activity will require that a plan for appropriate reclamation <br />of talus areas disturbed by this operation be developed and <br />included in the amendment application. Specific areas used <br />for this purpose will need to be delineated on the mine plan <br />and reclamation plan maps sa well. <br />5. DISPOSAL OF WASTB ROCH AND TAILINGS INTO OPBN PIT CIITS AND <br />CIIT & FILL TAILINGS DISPOSAL ARRAS <br />The comments provided under items a. through e. below are <br />taken from the geotechnical review comments provided by Allen <br />Sorenson of our Denver Office and forwarded to DGMC in memo <br />form via fax on 11/28/94. The comments outline a series of <br />specific commitments that will need to be accepted by DGMC <br />before the amendment application can be approved. The <br />requirements provided below for placement of tailings and <br />waste rock into the open pit cuts and the cut & fill tailings <br />disposal areas assume that the tailings and waste rock are <br />chemically benign. Rowever, this assumption has not as yet <br />been adequately verified through appropriate geochemical <br />analysis of actual waste rock material and spent ore <br />(tailings). Analyses of ore material only may not provide an <br />accurate representation of the chemical and physical nature of <br />the actual materials being disposed of. Of particular concern <br />is the filter cake type tailings material. Ph values, <br />relative concentrations of residual metals not extracted <br />during processing, and the consistency of the material after <br />processing may create a significant potential for tailings <br />material to contaminate surface and groundwater resources. <br />This potential may not be accurately reflected in analysis of <br />ore material only. Without a clear demonstration that the <br />actual material to be disposed of is chemically benign, it <br />will be necessary to add appropriate waste material <br />encapsulation features to the reclamation plan for this area. <br />Comments frog Allen Sorenson: <br />a. The moist, fine-grained spent ore will have to be blended <br />with coarse waste rock in order to "manufacture" an <br />acceptable fill material. Blending of the spent ore and <br />waste rock needs to result in a well graded backfill <br />material with 50 percent or more retained on a no. 4 <br />sieve. To provide quality assurance that the blended <br />backfill is acceptable, the operator should be required <br />to complete a gradation analysis of the backfill, in <br />accordance with an appropriate ASTM standard, at a <br />frequency of one analysis for each 2500 cubic yards of <br />fill placed. The sieve test results should be included <br />in each annual reclamation report; <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.