Laserfiche WebLink
<br />provided for each quarry indicate that a majority of the reclaimed slopes will be 4:l or greater <br />and that a. long, narrow pit will be left that is approximately 150 feet wide and lessihan 20 feet <br />deep. Fo:r purposes of determining a reclamation cost for each quarry, the Division will adhere to <br />the criteria provided in the 1977 and 1985 applications as closely as possible since these are the <br />presently approved reclamation plan contours. <br />OVERBIfRDEN VOLUMES <br />The volumes of overburden to be moved as provided in your January 16, 1998 report appear to <br />be only those required to achieve a maximum slope of 2:1 throughout all affected land to be <br />reclaimed. For purposes of determining a reclamation cost for each quarry, the Division must <br />calculate ~rverburden volumes to be moved according to the criteria listed in the 1977 and 1985 <br />applications as closely as possible since these aze the presently approved reclamation plan <br />contours for each site. Please be advised that you have the right to revise your reclamation plan <br />at any time. <br />BLASTII`fG <br />The costs provided in the January 16, 1998 report for blasting of the east highwalls were based <br />upon a typical slope of 0.8:1 at 50 vertical feet. Based upon a review of the information provided <br />in the permit, the recent map of existing topography, and field observations and photographs, it <br />appeazs that a typical slope of neaz vertical is more accurate. The only locations where a slope of <br />0.8:1 are noted aze where stockpiles of product or other fine grained material, located on an <br />adjacent mine bench, have sloughed or have been pushed over the edge. The Division requests <br />that Colocido Lien revise the typical drilling and blasting cross section and associated cost to <br />show the extent of drilling and blasting needed to produce a 2;1 slope from an almost vertical <br />highwall. Please address this concern. <br />Consideration will need to be given to the need for blasting of lazge rocks left in overburden <br />stockpiles where the size and weight of these rocks is either greater than the capacity of the <br />equipment used to move it or significantly reduces the efficiency of the equipment used to move <br />it. Please +tddress this concern. <br />PUSH/HAUL DISTANCE <br />Colorado Lien has provided an estimate of push distances for overburden material to be moved <br />in each qutury in the January 16, 1998 report. It should be noted that the representative cross <br />sections provided, based upon reclaimed slopes of 2:1, consistently show a major cut and <br />resulting material excess in the overburden slopes of the Rex Quarry and a major fill and <br />resulting material deficit in the pit azeas of the Owl Canyon Quarry. Therefore, it will be <br />necessary to include in the reclamation cost determination for each quarry acut-fill analysis that <br />considers volumes of overburden material to be moved both in a west-east direction as well as a <br />north-south direction. The Division must include, in the reclamation cost determination for each <br />quarry, costs for moving overburden in either north-south or west-east direction where <br />appropriate. <br />