My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_ENFORCEMENT - M1978352 (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1978352
>
_ENFORCEMENT - M1978352 (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 2:33:32 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:04:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978352
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
AFFIDAVIT OF MARK A HEIFNER 79-CV-1633
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
j make a copy and return it or is it your recommendation that <br /> 2 we keep this copy. <br /> 3WJ: Well, I 'd just as soon have you keep the original and, . . . . <br /> 4G: If you wish. <br /> 5RW: Will, would you respond to the question of Board action or <br /> 6 other items, that has some resemblance related to referral or <br /> 7 questions--of notice which we had yesterday. <br /> 8WJ: I think yesterday we had a much different situation. Yester- <br /> 9 day, there was no attempt whatsoever made to notify anyone. <br /> 10 In this particular case there have been not only attempts to <br /> 11 notify those people that were supposed to have been the owners, <br /> 12 but were not in fact, but there were actual letters sent out <br /> 13 to either representatives or parties intimately involved with <br /> 14 the person who was the actual owner and it may well have sa- <br /> 15 tisfied finding of actual notice in fact. Consequently, the <br /> 16 failure to notify the Owner through the process of mailing a <br /> 17 letter is debatable, since it in fact notice was given. <br /> 18RW: Unless there' s a motion to table or some such, we do have a <br /> 19 motion before us . I call the question. The motion is to <br /> 20 grant the permit, $7000 bond and with the [unintelligible] . <br /> 21RT: They would recognize the jurisdiction for the crossing was <br /> 22 not in Board [unintelligible] . <br /> 23WJ: Did you make a finding of actual notice, I think that' s <br /> 24 important. I think what you' re going to have to do is commit <br /> 25 yourself to . . . . <br /> 26RW: I assume, the Board' s response might indicate how its found. <br /> 27WJ: Don' t be so passive, just come right out and say it. Just <br /> 28 make a finding. <br /> 29SB: Mr. Chairman, I move that the Board does make. a finding that <br /> -34- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.