My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV09251
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV09251
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:09:46 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:01:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980245
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/6/1985
Doc Name
HOGBACK RECLAMATATION PLAN
From
USDA
To
ROBINSON BRICK CO
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Potential of the Hogback Mine for Raptor Nesting Habitat <br />On February 5 1985, I accompanied Eldie Mustard and Randx Hardzog of the Soil <br />Conservation Service on an inspection tour of the Robinson Brick Company's <br />Hogback Mine to determine the potential for establishing raptor nests on the <br />high wall which will remain after excavation. After we visited the site we met <br />with Mike Hissen of Robinson Brick Co: who explained restoration plans for the <br />mine. Following are my recommendations as to actions which might be undertaken <br />to induce occupancy by raptors. - <br />In order to attract nesting raptors the high wall must meet the following <br />criteria: <br />-It must be outside the territories of adjacent raptors; <br />-It must be adjacent to suitable hunting habitat; <br />-It must offer sufficient dominance to the surrounding terrain to serve as a <br />magnet to attract nesting raptors; and <br />-It must offer suitable sites (ledges or potholes) on which raptors can nest. <br />The species most likely to occupy a cliff nest site in this region are golden <br />eagles. prairie falcons, red-tailed hawks and great horned owls. The high wall <br />is probably not extensive enough to be occupied by more than 1 pair of one of <br />the above species. The exception is great horned owls which may nest on the <br />same escarpment if a nest ledge is created specifically for them at a distance <br />from other nests. Generally, the owls prefer deep potholes or crevasses which <br />shield them from direct sunlight. If the owls are not disturbed and flushed <br />during daylight, they will not be attacked by the adjacent nesting diurnal <br />raptors. . <br />With regard to the first criterion, the mine high wall is almost equidistant <br />between Martin Marietta to the north on which a pair of golden eagles have <br />nested in the past, "and Roxborough Park to the south which harbors a pair of <br />nesting golden eagles and 1 to 2 pairs of breeding prairie falcons. Golden <br />eagles and prairie falcons have been documented breeding at closer intervals and <br />the high wall is visually isolated sufficiently from the existing wild nest <br />sites to permit an additional pair of either species to establish a territory at <br />the mine. Thus, it is possible that additional cliff nesting habitat may attract <br />a pair of golden eagles, red-tailed hawks or a pair of prairie falcons. <br />It is impossible to establish if suitable unutilized hunting habitat exists <br />adjacent to the site. Since prairie falcons and golden eagles will easily <br />travel 10 miles to hunt, I suspect that sufficient habitat exists to the east <br />and the west to support an additional pair. <br />Although approximately 100 feet of sandstone is exposed at sector i3, the high <br />wall does not possess the dominance that I would prefer. The wall is not <br />perpendicular, but inclines slightly to the west and only the upper portion of <br />the wall is perpendicular at sector Y3. While the wall is inclined backward, it <br />appears to be sufficiently steep to discourage attempted access by mammalian <br />predators, so the nest ledges should be secure. In order to increase the <br />dominance, the overburden should not be pushed up against its base as would be a <br />normal part of the reclaimation effort. In fact, it would be helpful to <br />excavate more material at sector I3 in order to increase the height of the face. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.