Laserfiche WebLink
Sandy Brown <br />May 23, 2000 <br />Page 2 of 4 Pages <br />The response of reference d) is adequate. The density and strength pazameters allow for <br />vegetation in the material. The typo has been corrected (to 120 pct). <br />Reference b), Concern D <br />Reference c), Item 2 <br />Reference d), 2 <br />The response of reference d) is adequate. Soil conditions and locations aze adequately described. <br />Reference b), Concern E <br />Reference c), Item 3 <br />Reference d), 3 <br />The response of reference d) is adequate. An alternate to the relief drain concept is proposed that <br />is acceptable. Runoff is now directed to a sedimentation pond and the azea is not to be considered <br />as an SAE. Map 2.05-1 has been revised to eliminate the road across the slope. <br />Reference b), Concern F <br />Reference c), Item 4 <br />Reference d), 4 <br />The response of reference d) is adequate. The applicant proposes appropriate rirpap protection of <br />the culverts. <br />Reference b), Concern G <br />Reference c), Item 55 <br />Reference d), 55 <br />The response of reference d) is adequate. The cut slopes of the road have been laid back to where <br />alternative designs are not used (supporting geotechnical analyses not required}. <br />Reference b), Concern H <br />Reference c), Item 56 <br />Reference d), 56 <br />The response of reference d) is accepted. Riprap over geo-textile material is proposed. The <br />operator may find this design difficult to maintain. <br />Reference b), Concem K <br />Reference c). Item 57 <br />