My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV08930
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV08930
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:09:27 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:58:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/23/2000
Doc Name
INTEROFFICE MEMO TR-32 REVIEW
From
DMG
To
SANDY BROWN
Type & Sequence
TR32
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> 999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DeUarlmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Sl., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />DIVISION O F <br />Phone: (3031 8663567 MINERAL S <br />FAX: 1303)832-8106 & <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> <br />Interoffice MEMORANDUM AEC LA MATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br /> Bill (Teens <br />to: Sandy Brown Governor <br />-~J <br />from: Byron G. Walker ~~i`~ Greg E. Watcher <br /> <br />subject: TR-32 Review EvecuU Ve Director <br /> Michael8 Long <br />date: May 23, 2000 Division D rector <br />references: <br />a) your a-mail of May 22, 2000, Oxbow TR-32 <br />b) my memo March 3, 2000, subject: TR-32 Review <br />c) your letter of March 17, 2000, to Oxbow Re: Adequacy Review, Technical Revision No. 32, <br />Proposed Elk Creek Facilities, Sanborn Creek Mine, Permit No. C-81-022, Oxbow Mining, Inc. <br />d) Oxbow Comments of May 2000 <br />The following review is provided in response to reference a) above. <br />Reference b), Concern A <br />Reference c), Item 1 (page 2) <br />Reference d), I . <br />The response of reference d) is adequate. The applicant proposes protection of the embankment <br />at the inlets of DA and DA(2) by HDP liners and riprap on the upstream embankments to an <br />elevation one foot above the top of the culverts. <br />Reference b), Concern B <br />Reference c), Item la (page 3) <br />Reference d), 1. <br />The response of reference d) is adequate. A copy of the triaxial test was provided. Locations of <br />samples are shown. The stability analysis applies to the 40-foot fill. Dry densities and moisture <br />contents are developed. The plan provides for compaction quality control. The stability report <br />(Appendix J) calls for 2-foot lifr thickness. Provision is included for subsequent monitoring and <br />reports. <br />Reference b), Concem C <br />Reference c), Item 2 <br />Reference d), 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.