Laserfiche WebLink
99 <br />1 pertains to other people who may be adversely <br />2 affected. The statute seems to assume that an <br />3 operator who's been issued a notice of violation is <br />4 able to request a hearing in front of the board <br />5 either on the notice of violation or on some change <br />6 to that notice of violation. <br />7 So I don't understand where the argument <br />8 on standing comes in with regard - - certainly with <br />9 regards to this statement of being adversely <br />10 affected. So I just address that, and I think the <br />11 parties are going to want to proba bly rebut me on <br />12 that, but l et me finish my little comments, and <br />13 then we can turn it back over to them. <br />14 Again, Steve Brown raised the issue of <br />15 the language of the statute . If they can appeal a <br />16 vacation, then the division should have authority, <br />17 but I've already addressed my thoughts on what the <br />18 statute says on that. <br />19 Mr. Brown raised, I think, a very valid <br />20 point regarding the assessment conference process. <br />21 His point is that if they can hold an assessment <br />22 conference and at that assessment conference they <br />23 can discuss not only the civil penalty that has <br />24 been proposed but, in fact, the notice of violation <br />25 itself, then it doesn't make se nse that they <br />