Laserfiche WebLink
57 <br />1 member of the mining community with the sort of <br />2 casualness with which that appears that NOVs come <br />3 and go; that, in fact, there should be some sort of <br />4 substantiation and validation regardless of what <br />5 the action is that's been taken. <br />6 So I think I'm somewhat persuaded right <br />7 now that in order to close that chapter that there <br />e should be some sort of statement of fact or <br />9 whatever you want to call it by the agency in <br />10 substantiating its withdrawal of the NOV. <br />11 MR. JANOSEC: Can we wait for that after <br />12 we hear Mr. Morris and Mr. Brown? <br />i3 MR. CATTANY: You bet. <br />14 MR. JANOSEC: Thank you. Any other <br />15 questions for Mr. Anderson? <br />16 MR. MCCULLOH: I've got one. You say <br />17 you don't contest that there was cracks? <br />18 MR. ANDERSON: No. <br />19 MR. MCCULLOH: Damage? <br />20 MR. ANDERSON: No. <br />21 MR. MCCULLOH: But you do contest -- <br />22 MR. ANDERSON: Causality. I mean, this <br />23 goes to the merits of the case, but we're <br />24 persuaded -- I mean, clearly the house has been <br />25 suffering some structural damage, and I don't doubt <br />