Laserfiche WebLink
10 <br />1 then we wish to intervene in that proceeding for <br />2 the limited purpose of explaining our view that the <br />3 board doesn't have jurisdiction to grant Hasin's <br />4 motion. <br />5 If this is not a separate proceeding, if <br />6 the board takes Basin's view that this is somehow a <br />7 continuation of a proceeding that DMG has <br />8 officially notified the Tatums had been canceled, <br />9 then we elect not to proceed or participate in this <br />10 proceeding with all due respect to the board. <br />11 MR. HELD: Mr. Chairman. <br />12 MR. SANOSEC: Yes. <br />13 MR. HELD: Mr. Morris? <br />14 MR. MORRIS: Yes. <br />15 MR. HELD: This is Mark Held again, the <br />16 attorney for the board. If you view this is a new <br />17 proceeding today, it is unrelated to the prior <br />18 proceeding. Can you explain to the board what the <br />19 new proceeding is? <br />20 MR. MORRIS: As we see it, Basin's <br />21 motion to set aside the vacation of the former <br />22 notice of violation is a proceeding that is <br />23 contemplated under the board's rules and the <br />24 Colorado statute. We don't think Basin has the <br />25 standing to maintain that proceeding, but there is <br />