Laserfiche WebLink
Adequacy Review. Proposed Permit Revision 04 <br />Kine Coal Mine (C-81-0351 <br />General <br />The materials submitted, where they constitute revisions of earlier permit application <br />narrative or maps, should be dated m order that the relationship to this revision be clear. <br />Rule 2.03.4 <br />Identification of Interest section is incomplete. Please identify the relationship of Kirwood <br />Oil and Gas to National King Coal and list all officers and directors of each company. <br />If National King Coal is the operator and permittee of the King Coal Mine, then this needs to <br />be stated in this section. <br />An Applicant Violators System check performed on January 7, 1994 has a system <br />recommendation of DENY. This is due to a delinquent AML fee. Please correct this <br />matter. <br />Rule 2.04.6 <br />Page 4, the second sentence under Coal Quality "Coal analysis as well as..." should be <br />deleted as it appears in the next paragraph. <br />Rule 2.04.7 <br />1. The permit does not have a Probable Hydrologic Consequence section. With the <br />revision, Appendix 4(6), "Effects of Mining on Ground Water" was submitted and <br />may be edited for this purpose. Additionally, Section 2.04.7, page 6, first paragraph <br />("As all mine workings...") could also be prefaced with "PHC". I~.,. ,alone <br />these two edits are not enough to comprise a sufficient PHC. <br />What is needed in the permit is documentation utilizing baseline (if possible) and <br />present monitoring results in both identify trends in chemical parameters and water <br />quality, and to predict a reasonable future impact scenario. <br />This dceumentation needs to include the following: <br />a. A °ualitY analysis of probable hydrologic consequences of mining for both the <br />surface and ground waters in the permit area at present, and within the new <br />acreage to be added from this revision. <br />