Laserfiche WebLink
1, <br />l <br />• • <br /> SPRING DATA RECEIVED AND WHEN <br />******t*****r,tt**,t,t****~~,t*tt***~*************~***************r** <br />A-2 4th Q visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />A-2 1st Q visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />A-2 March visit \ none <br />A-2 April visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />C-1 4th Q visit \ 1/6/95 <br />C-1 1st Q visit \ 1/6/95 <br />C-1 March visit \ none <br />C-1 April visit \ 1/6/95 <br />C-2 4th Q visit \ 1/6/95 <br />C-2 1st Q visit \ 1/6/95 <br />C-2 March visit \ none <br />C-2 April visit \ 1/6/95 <br />at assessment <br />at assessment <br />at assessment <br />at assessment <br />at assessment <br />at assessment <br />conference <br />conference <br />conference <br />conference <br />conference <br />conference <br />Springs discovered flowing at greater than 35 gpm in May of 1993 <br />are as follows: <br />O, Mine 1, C-1, D, E, M2-87, Q, R <br />The requirements for each of these springs would be May flow and <br />field parameters as well as a full suite sample. Again, the chart <br />below details the information to-date for those sites originally <br />determined to be deficient. <br />SPRING DATA RECEIVED AND WHEN <br />******~**f****,t*,t~*****~*,t**t*~********,t*******t*****~~,t*t***~t** <br />O May 93 visit \ no full suite sample received <br />O 3rd Q visit \ none <br />Mine 1 May 93 \ no full suite sample received <br />Mine 1 3rd Q \ none <br />C-1 3rd Q visit\ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />M2-87 May 93 \ Full suite provided by FAX 10/14/94 <br />M2-87 3rd Q \ none <br />It is worth noting that for sites listed which show that eventually <br />the data was received, in no case was data received BEFORE the <br />fourth request from the Division and for l0 of 19 sites the data <br />was received at the time of the assessment conference, well after <br />the EXTENDED abatement date of December 9, 1994. It would be <br />inappropriate to accept data after abatement of a violation, <br />particularly when the abatement procedures specifically requested <br />as a step to abate the violation that all missing data be provided. <br />If this data were to be accepted, it could only be done under a <br />FTACO, where a penalty of $750.00 per dayt would be assessed from <br />December 10, 1994 to January 6, 1995. The Division requests that <br />the original penalty of $1,250.00 be upheld. <br />If you have questions, please call me. <br />