My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20687
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20687
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:07 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:49:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/9/1995
Doc Name
NOV C-94-029 DETAIL OF MISSING SPOIL SPRING DATA MINE 1 MINE 2 ECKMAN PARK C-81-071
From
DMG
To
SANDY BROWN
Violation No.
CV1994029
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~~~ I~~I~~I~IIIIII~I <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION Of MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorario 80203 <br />Phone: 130 31 866-3 567 <br />FAX: 13031 832-8106 <br />Date: January 9, 1995 <br />To: Sandy Brown <br />From: Kent Gorhazq <br />CC: David Berry <br />~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. lochhead <br />Eeeculive Direct or <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Direcwr <br />RE: NOV C-94-029, Detail of missing spoil spring data, Mine 1, <br />Mine 2, Eckman Park, {C-81-071 <br />As discussed at the assessment conference on January 6, 1995 for <br />the above cited NOV, I am providing the following information <br />pertaining to the missed spoil spring sampling data. <br />Springs flowing at greater than 35 gpm springs discovered in May of <br />1992 would be reported in the 1993 Annual Hydrology Report for the <br />period October 1992 to April 1993. From the May 1992 spring and <br />seep survey the following springs were determined to be flowing at <br />greater than 35 gallons per minute (gpm) and therefore should be <br />visited quarterly for flow and field parameters and semi-annually <br />for a full suite quality sample. <br />A-2, C-1, C-2, D comp. <br />For these springs, the operator contends that D comp. is the full <br />suite quality site that characterizes all springs in the A-D group. <br />If that is the case, the flow of the A-C springs should approximate <br />the flow for D comp., since D comp. is directly below the A-C <br />series. <br />Flow of A-C series = 1.862 cfs <br />Flow of D Comp. = 1.1 cfs <br />69$ difference in flow. <br />Regardless of the above relationship, if the Division were to <br />concede the full-suite quality sample for D comp as meeting the <br />requirements for A-C full suite sampling, based on flow there would <br />still be a quarterly requirement for flow and field parameters at <br />A-C series springs. The following lists the required visits for <br />the A-C series springs which meet these requirements and also if <br />and when data was received for each. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.