REV07979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C. All existing mine portal water sources have been covered up, this was a pre-mining stock water source. D. Tank connected to a 6" city water line and 3" water well line. Although owner ship of both is in question, lines still exist on property and could be reactivated to another source: ponds, other water wells, and mine portal water. E. Tank ie also interconnected to both the prep plant and shop building through pipelines on property. 8. Garage 8. Office Concrete Pads A. Have already keen removed, too late to save these structures. 9. Starkville Gulch Diversion Culvert (675 ft.) A. If removed would limit access to shop building on south and east walls. B. With upstream silt control, culvert would require little maintenance. 10. Water Wells, Pumps, Pump house, Pipeline, and kelated Equipment A. If landowner can obtain ownership of property and wells, they should 6e left intact for a water source for livestock in tt,r event the sediment pond isn't retained ae permanent or silts in. B. Water wells end piping oleo feed water tank to he used ae storage fnr water. C. In event tank isn't retained, water wells could still supply shop and prep plant with water on a pressure demand system. We hope the above reasons for tF,e requested facilities to remain will demonstrate to the DIVISION our plane for the future of the property end the facilities. We find it hard to demonstrate our needs when we have no idea of the DIVISION'S plane far our future. We are sure that same of these reasons will drew criticism from the DIVISION end we will try to rebut that criticism. We hope this letter will stand ae s letter of opposition from the landowner as to future DIVISION plane in regards to the facilities mentioned, Items 1 through 10. We would like all recent contact between Jim Iuppa and the DIVISION documented ae our initial opposition to the DIVISION plane. Those contacts include: 7/13/94 - Conversation on phor,c- with Mike Long, 7/15/94 - Met with Mr. Erickeor, and Mr. Berry et tt,e Denver office. Discussed our concerns for approximately 2 hours. 7/20/94 - Met with Mr. Erickeor, fox- further discussion at Raton Creek Mines. We feel that a visit by yourself to Rotor, Creek Mines would be beneficial to all parties involved. To visually see these facilities end their layout enhances our reasoning for their permanence. Your promptness in this matter ie necessary to avoid any future unnecessary destruction of facilities or, Uur'pY'Gpecl'ty. We expect to