My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV07329
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV07329
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:08:12 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:42:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/25/1999
Doc Name
SECTION 4
Type & Sequence
TR26
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Se~B'cav~ ~" <br />• 5.0 SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT <br />A screening level risk assessment (SERA) was conducted to evaluate potential human and <br />ecological risks associated with the West Pit and the Rito Seco (Appendix D). The SERA <br />addressed: (1) human health risks associated with domestic and recreational use; (2) agricultural <br />irrigation and livestock watering; and (3) potential affects associated with aquatic organisms (i.e., <br />benthic invertebrates and fish) and wildlife (i.e., aquatic and terrestrial birds and mammals). <br />The SERA was conducted in general accordance with USEPA guidance for human health and <br />ecological risk assessment (U.S. EPA, 1989 and 1998). The task structure reflects a human <br />health risk pazadigm including: (1) hazazd identification, (2) toxicity assessment, (3) exposure <br />assessment, and (4) risk chazacterization. Available site data were used to chazacterize <br />conditions in the stream and surrounding habitat, the appropriate chemical constituents, media <br />and mode of constituent transport, and potential human and ecological receptor populations. <br />• A three-step process was used to identify and evaluate the potential effects of constituents <br />transported in groundwater from the West Pit. This screening process included eliminating: (1) <br />all chemicals monitored but not detected in the Rito Seco, (2) all chemical and physical <br />parameters for which the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) and <br />USEPA has not developed a water quality criterion, and (3) chemicals for which the mean and <br />maximum concentration at each stream sampling station for the period December 1997 to <br />January 1999 were in complianc licable criteria. The results of these comparisons are <br />presented i ables 5 and 6 of Appendix D. <br />The constituents identified in the three-step process that may affect aquatic life protection were <br />further evaluated in regazd to the number of detections, detection limits, and the applicable <br />USEPA and CDPHE water quality criteria. In addition, the water quality database for the Ri[o <br />Seco was evaluated using the three-step process and TDS, sulfates, and manganese were <br />subsequently identified as in relation to agricultural and domestic water use. Additional <br />screening analyses were conducted for TDS, sulfate, and manganese with the result that TDS and <br />sulfate were removed from further consideration because the concentrations of TDS and sulfate <br />Battle Mountain Resources, lnc. <br />pal00?671reporlslmnrthrptlv16w1rmngtmarch.doc 60 Mnrch?2. /999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.