My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV06941
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV06941
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:07:55 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:38:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/6/1997
Doc Name
INTERIM LANDS BOND RELEASE REQUEST
Type & Sequence
SL3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Center Ridge: <br />E'/~ NE'/., Sectiott 24, T4N, R86W <br />NW'/< SE'/<, Section 24, T4N, R86W <br />South-of--Shop: <br />W '/: N W '/<, Section 19, T4N, R85 W <br />NE'/ NW %, Section l9, T4N, R85W <br />14. Map of release request area: <br />Exhibit 1 shows the location of the bond release request azea. <br />15. Dates reclamation work performed: <br />East Ridge: Seeding performed in 1981. <br />Center Ridge: Seeding performed in 1981. <br />South-of--Shop: Grading performed in 1988. <br />Seeding performed in 1988. <br />16. Description of the reclamation results achieved: <br />• East Ridge -East Ridge was initially mined prior to any reclamation laws. However, <br />a portion was re-mined and reclaimed under the federal Surface Mining Control and <br />Reclamation Act (SMCRA; P.L. 95-87) Interim Regulations and the Colorado Mined <br />Land Reclamation Act (CMLRA) Regulations (effective May, 1977). This portion of <br />the azea did not undergo final seeding until after the promulgation of the Colorado <br />Surface Mining Reclamation Act (CSMRA) Regulations (effective August 30, 1980). <br />Therefore, this portion of East Ridge was included in the estimation of the <br />reclamation liability bond associated with Permit C-80-001. <br />The CMLRA did not contain quantitative vegetation pazameters for determining <br />success of reclamation, but rather contained subjective criteria calling for vegetation <br />sufficient to control erosion. Through discussions between P&M and the CDMG, i[ <br />.vas mutually agreed that a vegetation cover value of 47% would fulfill the <br />requirement of vegetation sufficient to control erosion. This value was based in part <br />• on a previous reclamation liability release for the remainder of East Ridge and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.