Laserfiche WebLink
8. The proposed ground conditions and the DMG selections for the watersheds were <br />reviewed, and the following curve numbers were selected: <br />WATERSHED SUGGESTED DMG REVISED MCC REASON FOR MCC <br /> CURVE # CURVE # SELECTION <br />9A 91 88 Graded area w/mulch <br /> cover <br />9D 81 81 Herbaceous cover <br />9E 89 89 Roadwa <br />35A 91 88 Graded area w/mulch <br /> cover <br />35F 91 88 Graded azea w/mulch <br /> cover <br />35G 91 88 Graded area w/mulch <br /> cover <br />36A 91 87 Pad surfaced with <br /> 3/4" road base <br />36B 91 88 Graded area w/mulch <br /> cover <br />36C 91 88 Graded area w/mulch <br /> cover <br />36E 91 88 Graded area w/mulch <br /> cover <br />36F 91 87 Pad surfaced with <br /> 3/4" road base <br />9. No response is required. <br />10. No response is required. <br />11. A revised Map 54 is enclosed with this response. <br />12. The calculations of flows into the structures have been re-evaluated and revised. <br />12A. Flow into Culvert C2-R3 includes flow into CR-4 and flow from watershed 28, <br />which is 0.06 cfs of 7.37 cfs. <br />12B. Flow into Culvert C2R-4 is derived from flow from the following watersheds <br />WS25 (0.62 cfs); WS16 (1.73 cfs); WS26 (0.23 cfs); WS27 (0.79 cfs); WS21 (3.27 cfs); <br />and WS32 (0.67 cfs). This adds up to 7.31 cfs. <br />4 <br />