My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-07-21_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-07-21_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 7:32:26 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/21/1992
Doc Name
MINUTES MLRB
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Minutes, July 22-24, 1992 <br />~~~-~ <br />Subject To Board Approval 5 <br />In response to an inquiry from the Board, Staff said the operator has <br />provided information that installation of the INCO process could be <br />completed by late September, if construction is initiated immediately. <br />In a summary, the Director stated that the Division feels the cyanide <br />levels in the ponds are being reduced by the operator's efforts. He <br />further clarified that the only issue being considered by the Board at <br />this time reiates to the violation found during the March 1992 Board <br />Meeting. The Director explained that the Division has written no other <br />violations against the operator which will be considered at this time. <br />At this time, Mr. Dean Massey, an attorney representing th? operator, <br />addressed the Board and stated that the presentation made by the <br />Division was accurate in its description of the activities, that have <br />occurred at the site in the past 30 days. He said the operator concurs <br />with the Order being proposed by the Division. <br />In response to a question from the Board, Mr. Massey said the operator <br />has not gathered any evidence that water fowl has been harmed from the <br />contents of the pond. He said that tests of the 3 carcasses found near_ <br />the pond did not indicate that death was caused by cyanide poisoning. <br />Ms. Nora Jacquez, representing the Costilla County Committee on <br />Environmental Soundness, and Mr. Roger Flynn, representing the People's <br />Alternative Energy Services, addressed the Board. Ms. Jacquez <br />commended the operator on detoxification efforts. However, she stated <br />that her clients would be in opposition to any reduction cf standards <br />for cyanide levels other than those of 4.4 and 3.8 as originally <br />permitted. <br />In reference to Paragraph 6 of the proposed Order, Ms. Jacquez said her <br />clients would like for a deadline to be included by which the operator <br />must comply with permitted cyanide levels. She also said she felt that <br />there is a lack of clarity in Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Order which <br />addresses using 2 of the ponds interchangeably and ceasing the release <br />of tailings, if the reduced cyanide levels are not maintained. <br />In regard to the issue of independent monitoring which was discussed at <br />previous Board Meetings, Ms. Jacquez proposed that, because of <br />sedimentation in the Rito Seco Creek, independent monitoring include <br />samples from the Creek, as well as the ponds. <br />Mr. Roger Flynn discussed concerns about establishment of and the <br />operator's compliance with monitoring plans. Specifically, he <br />discussed the operator's proposal for a 30-day sampling ~~eriod. Mr. <br />Flynn said that although his clients would like sampling conducted on a <br />daily basis, they would compromise with a procedure requiring weekly <br />analysis, preferably continuing throughout the winter. He also <br />discussed a concern about requiring compliance standards for discharges <br />at the spigot. Mr. Flynn said his clients want the site i~t compliance <br />prior to this year's onset of winter. However, he said his clients <br />would accept the operator's proposal for using the INCO pro_ess (TR-10) <br />for further detoxification. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.