Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Minutes, July 22-24, 1992 <br />Staff said the Committee decided <br />fees, because the Program does <br />charge fees to the participants <br />problem of a lack of statutory <br />participation. <br />D RAFT <br />~~ubject To Board Approval "' <br />not to extend two rules, relating to <br />not have the statutory authority to <br />in the Program. SB 163 resolved the <br />authority to charge fees for program <br />Staff said the two Rules in question, 8.02.2 and 8.02.3, have been <br />properly noticed for repromulgal:ion in conformance with new statutory <br />language. <br />Staff presented ATTACHMENT C, the Statement of Basis, Specific <br />Statutory Authority and Purpose, and stated that it allows MSPP to <br />legally charge each participant a fee (currently $35) for participation <br />in the Program. <br />In response to an inquiry from the Board, Staff said that once fees <br />have been set, the Board would need to conduct further rule-making in <br />order to adjust those fees. Mr. Frank Johnson clarified that SB 163 <br />gave the Board the authority to assess an administrative fee, with the <br />amount being determined by the Board. <br />It was MOVED that the Board adopt the rules as submitted. SECONDED AND <br />PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (Kraeger-Rovey, Cooley, Stewart, Danielson, Danni <br />and McCannoN . <br />Presentation by Frank Johnson: <br />13. DISCUSSION ITEM <br />Consideration of revised Cease and Desist Orders (continued from the <br />May 1992 Board Meeting). <br />Mr. Frank Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, referenced ATTACHMENT D, <br />a July 6, 1992 memo to the Board, regarding this matter. He said this <br />issue was addressed during the April 1992 Board Meeting. At that time, <br />the Board requested that a procedure be developed allowing them to <br />present operators with cease and desist orders immediately following a <br />hearing, specifically for mining without a permit or prospecting <br />without a Notice of Intent. <br />The cease and desist orders Mr. ,Johnson drafted were addressed during <br />the April Board Meeting at which time the Board requested that two <br />changes be made to the documents. The draft orders included language <br />about suspension of civil penalties, and the Board asked that it be <br />deleted and that he separate the corrective action portion of the <br />orders from the civil penalty portion. Mr. Johnsen referenced <br />Attachment D and said Exhibits A, B and C, respectively, are cease and <br />desist orders for mining without a permit, conducting prospecting <br />operations without filing a notice of intent and an interim order which <br />could be used in Goth instances while awaiting the preparation of the <br />final cease and desist order. Mr. Johnson said the forms presented <br />today included the changes requested by the Board. <br />