1992-07-21_REVISION - M1988112

• Permit No: M1988112
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 7/21/1992
• Doc Name: MINUTES MLRB
• Type & Sequence: AM1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

•
Minutes, July 22-24, 1992
10. DISCUSSION ITEM
AMES CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED
20790 East Smith Road
Aurora, CO 80011
DRAiiT
Subject To Board Approval
Sec. 7, T3S, R65 and 66W, 6th
surface borrow pit application.
pre-hearing conference officer be
the application.
File No. M-91-137
.M., Adams County, 480 acres; 112
Consideration of a request that a
appointed to consider objections to
Staff said the Division has received an objection to the approval of
this 112 permit application from the City of Aurora. Staff said the
proposed site is located northwest of the new airport.
On July 2, 1992 the Division held an informal conference, regarding
this matter, and three issues remain unresolved. Mr. Fraik Johnson,
Assistant Attorney General, recommended that a Pre-hearing Conference
Officer be appointed. He said he would contact the City of Aurora's
representative, in an attempt to resolve the outstanding issues prior
to the need to schedule a Pre- hearing Conference. _ _
It was MOVED that Board Member Stewart be appointed as Pre-hearing
Conference Officer to hear the objections in the matter, if necessary.
SECONDED AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (Kraeger-Rovey, Cooley, Stewart,
Danielson, Danni and McCannon).
Staff Presentation by James C. Stevens:
11. FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING
RIPPY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
P. 0. Box 200
New Castle. CO 81647
File No. M-81-012
Sec. 24, T85, R97W, Mesa County, 49 acres; 112 sand and gravel
operation. Consideration of a possible notice of violation, cease and
desist order, corrective actions and civil penalties for failure to
maintain financial warranty in good standing. Continuance--to the
August 1992 Board Meeting; the operator requested a 30-day continuance
pending a possible Succession of Operator adn Transfer of Permit.
Staff Presentation by Dave Bucknam:
12. RULE-MAKING
Colorado Mine Subsidence Protection Program
Amendment of Rule 8.
Staff said that in late 1991 the legislative Legal Services Committee
("Committee") reviewed rules from the Coal Program and the Mine
Subsidence Protection Program. As a result of that review, the
Committee decided not to extend some of the rules. Staff explained
that for rules to remain in effect, they must be extended by the
Legislature on a yearly basis, with the exception of those that are
specifically excluded from extension.