Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Remediation Report and Treatment plan February l2, 2004 <br />Varra Companies, Inc. Page 2 of 8 <br />Durham Pit 1 I7 <br />Greeley, Colorado <br />CGRS was retained by Varra to provide consulting and oversight of the remediation project. Field screening <br />techniques such as monitoring volatile organic hydrocazbon concentrations with a photoionization detector <br />(PID) and visual observations were employed by CGRS to determine the extent of excavation. When field- <br />screening observations indicated that the hydrocazbon impacted soil had been removed, representative soil <br />samples were obtained from the limits of the excavation, including the excavation sidewalk and bottom to <br />document that adequate cleanup levels were achieved. <br />The extent of excavation encompassed an azea of approximately 990 squaze feet and extended to a depth of <br />approximately 9-feet below ground surface (bgs}. The deepest post excavation sampling point extended to a <br />depth of approximately 12-feet bgs and no groundwater was encountered. The estimated in-place volume of <br />soil removed from the excavation is approximately 330 cubic yards, which equates to approximately 4301oose <br />yards when considering a bulking factor of 30 percent. The excavated soil was stockpiled on a concrete pad to <br />prevent cross-contamination with the underlying soil. The stockpile is located south of the truck scales <br />building in the central azea of the site pending treatment. A site map depicting the excavation azea is included <br />as Figure 2. Photographs of the excavation are included in Attachment A. <br />Soil Lithology <br />Soil lithology in the excavation area consists of sand and gravel fill from the surface to approximately 2-feet <br />below ground surface (bgs). Interbedded layers of clay and clayey-silt with some discontinuous sand lenses <br />extend from approximately 2 to 9-feet bgs. Below 9-feet is coarse sand and gravel. Field screening <br />observations indicate that the vertical migration of diesel was impeded by the fine clay and silt soils underlying <br />the area of the release. Characteristics observed such as black organic discoloration corresponding with PID <br />readings in excess of 100 parts per million (ppm) indicate petroleum hydrocarbons were retained in the clay <br />and silt. Field screening of the underlying sand indicated the absence of organic vapors and no appazent <br />discoloration below 9-feet bgs was observed. As excavation proceeded, the apparent discoloration of the soil <br />provided a visual marker for determining the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination, -which was <br />confirmed with the PID. The fuel depot excavation is located approximately 25-feet above the Tract A <br />excavation dewatering trench. Based on the elevation to water in the trench, it is estimated that depth to <br />groundwater is in excess of 15-feet below the base of the excavation. <br />Sampling <br />CGRS obtained sixteen confirmation soil samples from the outer limits of the excavation, including thirteen <br />from the sidewalk at depths ranging from 4 to 8-feet bgs and three from the bottom at approximate depths of <br />10 to 12-feet. Soil sample locations aze depicted on Figure 3. Sidewall samples (Sample ID prefixes WW, <br />EW, 1VW and SW) were spaced at distances ranging from approximately 12 to 20-feet along the perimeter of <br />the excavation- The camnrle the and lg~tinne were_shneen to~e,[pond wi h coil hori one hat 3ppea*ed _ <br />most impacted during excavation, exhibited evidence of possible residual contamination based on appearance, <br />as well as random locations. The bottom sampling points (Sample IDs B-1, B-2 & B-3) generally correspond <br />with the azea below the release location and below the zone where the most elevated PID concentrations were <br />detected in the overlying soil. <br />Five soil samples were also obtained from the soil stockpile (Sample IDs SP-1 through SP-5) to document <br />hydrocazbon concentrations in the excavated soil. <br />Soil samples were obtained using a hand auger as well as the excavator bucket. Soil samples were placed in <br />laboratory supplied glass sampling jars with Teflon lined lids, were placed on ice in a sample cooler and were <br />delivered to the testing laboratory with chain-of-custody documentation. <br />