My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV05756
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV05756
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:04:22 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:27:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/3/1989
Doc Name
KERR PR C-80-006
From
MLRD
To
CATHY BEGEJ
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />STATE OF COLO:v-~L~U <br />Roy Romer, Gove <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R, BANTA, Director <br />DATE: October 3, 1989 <br />T0: Cathy Begej <br />FROM: Tim King /~ <br />RE: Kerr Permit Revision, C-80-006 <br />After careful review of this permit revision, sent by Kerr Coal Company for <br />this Marr Mine, I find serious faults with this plan that, in my estimation, <br />cannot allow it to be approved. " <br />In volume 2, Rule 2.05, "Operation and Reclamation Plans", page 2.05.3 - 33, <br />Kerr proposes two permanent overburden stockpiles, stating that they will <br />conform to all reclamation standards. Page 2.05.3-49 states that their <br />overburden stockpiles "have been designed as an integral part of the planned <br />postmining topography *to blend with surrounding reclaimed and undisturbed <br />terrain." Page 2.05.3- s a es "The final surface of the overburden <br />stockpiles will be left in a *rough graded condition to minimize overland flow <br />and prevent erosion." Rule 1. o e requires that this area <br />" .. closely *resembles the general surface configuration of the land prior to <br />mining and *blen s in o and compliments the drainage pattern of the <br />surrounding terrain with all the highwalls and spoil piles eliminated." The <br />revision then refers to Map 38, "Postmining Topography Map" which illustrates <br />the proposed overburden stockpiles after mining. The configuration of the <br />stockpiles appears to show that they do not closely resemble the general <br />surface configuration and do not blen wi the surrounding reclaimed area. <br />This map also depicts vestiges of highwalls in place, not eliminated as <br />required. I am unable to visualize any back filled pits, eliminated <br />spoilpiles, or eliminated highwalls from this map. <br />On page 2.05.4-15 of this same volume, Kerr Coal Company refers to pre-mining <br />topography characterized by rolling hills and steep rocky ridges <br />intersected by a relatively deep ephemeral stream channels .. Map 38 <br />appears to show o-ther topography, lacking steep rock ridges and deep stream <br />channels. Also on this same map, Kerr appears to show more than one drainage <br />proceeding through two 90° turns as well as travelling directly through the <br />bottom of the pit. Other drainages are shown as completely cut off uphill <br />from the pit and resuming downhill from the pit. It shows no drainage path <br />within the pit area Kerr appears to neglect any address of this within this <br />revision. <br />* - Emphasis added. <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.