|
Memo to Burnell
<br />August 23, 2000
<br />Page 2 of 3 Pages
<br />Line Items of Table 1 Holes Comments
<br />
<br />6 through 14 89-9-1, 89-9-2, 89-9- These holes are reported as having been
<br /> 3, 89-9-4, 89-9-5, 89- reclaimed (Table 1).
<br /> 9-6,89-9-7,89-9-8,
<br /> and 89-9-9
<br />34 UL-95-45 This well is reported as having been reclaimed on
<br /> Table 1. However, it was licensed with the State
<br /> Engineer as a monitoring well. Clazification is
<br /> bein re nested of Colow o.
<br />35 through 38 UL-95-45A, UL-95- Surface disturbances associated with these wells
<br /> 40A, MT-95-O1, and have been reclaimed. These aze wells under
<br /> MT-95-02 license with the Colorado State Engineer's Office
<br />~ in the name of Colowyo Coal Company L.P.
<br /> Upon transfer to Colowyo as a land owner
<br /> (transfer under Rule 4.05.14)there would be no
<br /> liabilit for reclamation in the NOI.
<br />41 and 43 through 50 UL-96-29, 96-32, 96- These holes aze reported as having been
<br /> 33, 96-34, 96-35, 96- reclaimed (Table 1).
<br /> 36, 96-37, 96-38,and
<br /> 96-39
<br />70 97-27 This hole is reported as having been reclaimed
<br /> (Table 1).
<br />The following holes have been, as reported in Table 1, mining through.
<br />Line Items of Table 1 Hole Numbers Comments
<br />
<br />1 through 4 and 15
<br />through 17 89-4-1, 89-4-2, 89-4-
<br />3,89-4-4,89-9-10,
<br />89-9-11,and 89-10-8
<br />32 UL-95-40
<br />47, 48, and 58 96-36, 96-37, and 96-
<br />47
<br />60, 65, 68 and 69 97-12, 97-22, 97-25
<br />and 97-26
<br />By TR 50 (Table 1), the alternate reclamation of cover by excess spoil (West Pit Fill) is reported
<br />for Holes 4-94-2, 4-94-3, 4-94-4, 4-94-5, 4-94-6, 4-94-9, 4-94-10, 4-94-I 1, 4-94-12, 4-94-13, 4-
<br />94-14, 4-94-15, and 4-94-16 (Line Items 18 through 30). No retention of surface reclamation cost
<br />liability is appropriate as extended time periods for determination of surface reclamation success
<br />
|