My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV05453
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV05453
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:04:00 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:25:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/8/1991
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
From
MLRD
To
TRAPPER MINING INC
Type & Sequence
MT2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Midterm Review <br />Trapper Mine <br />(C-81-010) <br />This document presents the results of the Division's Midterm Review of the <br />Trapper Mining, Inc., Trapper Mine Permit. This Midterm Review was conducted <br />to fulfill the requirements of Rules 2.08,3, 2.06.2(10), 2.06.3(4), 2.06.7(5) <br />and 3.02.2(4). <br />Rule 2.08.3 requires that the Division conduct a review of each permit issued, <br />prior to its Midterm (2-1/2 years). Based on this review, for good cause <br />shown, the Division may require reasonable revisions or modifications of the <br />permit provisions to ensure compliance with the Act and Regulations. <br />Rules 2.06,2, 2.06.3, 2.06.5 and 2.06,7 require that experimental practices, <br />mountain top removal variances, variances form approximate original Contour <br />(AOC) and variances from contemporaneous reclamation, respectively, be <br />reviewed by the Division where applicable during the Midterm Review, <br />Rule 3.02.2(4) requires that the Division review the amount of the bond and <br />the terms of acceptance of the bond every 2-1/2 years. <br />This Midterm Review consisted of a detailed review of the Apex No. 2 Mine <br />permit application and Findings Document to identify any items that may have <br />been overlooked during the initial review. The Division also reviewed all <br />subsequent revisions and stipulation responses to ensure that all permit <br />commitments and conditions were being followed. Problems and observations <br />from past inspection reports were also considered. <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.