Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> 9 <br /> <br /> I that the amount of the recommended civil penalty which are being <br />' 2 considered today would be token amounts in consideration of what <br /> 3 I would be recommending. <br />' 4 With that as a backdrop, Mr. Chairman, I would like to <br /> 5 make a motion that this Board find na notice of violation. <br />' 6 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON <br />ti <br />I <br />th <br />d t <br />th <br />t <br />? <br /> ere a secon <br />a <br />mo <br />on <br />: <br />s <br />o <br />' 7 MR. COOLEY: Second. <br /> 8 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Discussion. <br />' 9 MS. KAEGER-ROVEY: I did have some difficulty in it <br /> 10 being no violation. I know that we are not going into legal <br /> 11 thin <br />s <br />but <br />s <br />n <br />o <br />thin <br />s that have <br />one <br />i <br />I <br /> g <br />, <br />eng <br />neer, <br />see s <br />me <br />g <br />g <br />a <br />a <br />' 12 wrong. And whether that was a fault of the Division or the Board <br /> 13 in the past or somebody else it leaves no remedy for the offended <br />' 14 parties. <br /> 15 MR. BANTA: I would disagree with that because he has <br /> 16 has recommended that corrective action be implemented, and the <br /> 17 problem ramified or will come back and find violation and imposed <br /> 18 civil penalties Por that crime. <br />' 19 MR. COOLEY: I think finding no violation and the civil <br /> 20 penalty really isn't going to give the parties any compensation. <br />' 21 It's not going to help them any. I think the corrective action <br /> 22 would. I think, they could take comfort in the fact that the <br />' 23 company would be directed to do things differently and finance <br />t 24 the damage that there is there. <br /> 25 And I think that's where the compensation is. But I <br />