Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />' 25 <br /> 1 commissioner cease and desist in this case with respect to the <br />' 2 Williams Canyon rock fall in affect, you almost immediately be in <br /> 3 a position to lift it because they are no longer pushing these <br />' 4 rocks in the area done with respect to the acces s road, if there <br /> 5 was a cease and desist placed on that, we would have to determine <br />' 6 tl <br />h <br />h <br /> exac <br />y w <br />at--w <br />at would be the trigger to lift that. <br />' 7 And again, I think it would be ceasing placing material <br /> 8 on it such a way and to continue the problem and my understanding <br />' 9 and discussed it with the operator is that they have already <br /> 10 ceased that also. <br />' 11 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON <br />Wh <br />' <br />if <br /> : <br />at <br />s correct you want to call <br /> 12 it corrective action, what is corrective action you would <br /> 13 recommend? <br />' 14 MR. HERNANDEZ: That was outlined in my inspection <br /> 15 report. What I recommended was for the west rock fall to be <br />' 16 draina <br />e <br />The corre <br />tiv <br />ti <br />th <br />t I <br />d <br />d <br />th <br />t <br /> g <br />. <br />c <br />e ac <br />on <br />a <br />recommen <br />e <br />was <br />a <br />' 17 reclaim the damage to the slope by reseeding and replacing damage <br /> 18 or lost trees. <br />' 19 Removal of rocks from the drainage was not necessary <br /> 20 and additional disturbances but would disadvantagous to it. As <br />' 21 to the offsite damage from the access road shoulders, what I said <br /> 22 was the operator to contact the geotechnical engineer as <br />' <br /> 23 described in Mr. Obering <br />s report regarding the reclamation of <br />' 24 the sites to provide that geotechnical analysis to the division <br /> 25 for review by August 21. <br />