My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV04859
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV04859
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:03:07 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:21:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/18/1994
Doc Name
MCCLANE CANYON MINE C-80-004 MID TERM REVIEW TR 07
From
GRAND VALLEY COAL CO
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR7
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESPONSE TO JUNE 7, 1994 <br />ID OF INTERESTS LETTER <br />1. Page A-1 has been clarified to show that the officers and <br />directors listed are for Grand Valley Coal Company. It should <br />be noted that the position of Vice President is now vacant. <br />2. Crand Valley Coal Company has been notified that White Oak <br />Mining and Construction is owned by Donald Todd Kiscaden. Scott <br />Kiscaden is on the board of directors. GVC has no idea how OSM <br />got their information. <br />3. Figures 1.1-3 a & b have been revised. <br />4. Grand Valley Coal Company or previous owners have been mining at <br />the McClane Canyon Mine since early 1977. This mining activity <br />predates the Rule cited. Additionally, GVC leases the area to <br />be mined from the Bureau of Land Management. The BLM is <br />notified of all activity at the mines through both the <br />Division's procedures and the BLM/MMS reporting requirements. <br />These requirements include the adoption of a resource recovery <br />and protection plan required by 43 CFR 3482.1. These plans and <br />permits as well as the Logical Mining Unit Formation Application <br />are adequate to notify the BLM of the mining plans for the area. <br />It is my interpretation of Rule 4.20.2(1), (2), and (3) that the <br />surface owner should be notified that mining is to commence so <br />that the surface owner can monitor the effects of mining with <br />regard to subsidence related property damage. The Division has <br />on numerous occasions made the determination that no subsidence <br />monitoring or control is necessary because there ere no surface <br />structures or renewable resources in the effected area. <br />The Division has indicated to me that this section of the rules <br />is to be followed if mining at an operation ceases and then <br />begins again. I see no provision of the rule that supports this <br />interpretation. Taken to extremes, is the operator required to <br />give six months notice if he intends to resume mining after <br />stopping for a three day Christmas weekend ? <br />RESPONSE TO JUNE 14, 1994 <br />INSURANCE CERTIFICATE LETTER <br />A new insurance certificate is included that expressly includes <br />the use of explosives. <br />Mc Page - 1 7/12/94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.