Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4. Page 112 to page 114 looks fine in terms of correct <br />amounts. The indirect cost does not match up because when we added <br />the additional cost for revegetation I did not redo the indirect <br />cost portion. Eastside numbers are fine. The total of the <br />existing and proposed equals $66,470.00, which is what really <br />counts. <br />5. On page 114 there appears to be a typo on the total bond <br />submitted to the Division. Eastside indicates the existing <br />reclamation cost to be $48,282.00 when it in fact should be <br />$48,828.00. Page 14a shows the correct amount, so this is probably <br />just a typo. <br />6. The existing and proposed reclamation tasks on Table 18 <br />are acceptable. <br />cc: Larry Routten <br />a:\930219 <br />