Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />included in the County Special Uae Permit. Times of operation have <br />produced objections from individuals residing near the operation <br />end es such it is important that this information be presented <br />clearly. <br />RfiCLAMATION PLAN DETAILS <br />The information presented in the amendment application indicates <br />some degree of uncertainty regarding whether the mined out phase 5, <br />6, & 7 area will fill with water and form a pond at. the conclusion <br />of mining. As such, the reclamation plan should cover both <br />scenarios, discussing specific reclamation activities that would <br />occur for a dry pit and for a pond scenario. Grading work on the <br />pit sides & bottom, topsoil replacement (shore.line areas only <br />versus the entire pit area), and revegetation details may differ <br />substantially for each scenario. <br />The reclamation plan end reclamation cost sections of the amendment <br />application may need to be modified to include reclamation of any <br />drainage control structures such as detention ponds and diversion <br />or collection ditches that are installed in accordance with the <br />approved stromwater management plan for the operation. Please <br />clarify. <br />It would appear that, due to the highly compacted nature of working <br />areas and the relatively shallow topsoil replacement depth, a more <br />substantial degree of compacted area ripping would be an essential <br />component of the reclamation plan in order to ensure adequate <br />rooting depth and successful revegetation of affected areas to meet <br />the proposed post-mining land use. Typical scarification methods <br />such as chisel plowing often are limited to a few inches; ii. would <br />seem that ripping to a depth of 2 ft. or more prior to tnpsoll <br />replacement would ensure adequate rooting depth. Please address <br />this issue. <br />TOPSOIL <br />A section of the amendment application states that "For the <br />majority of the area to be affected, little topsoil was salvaged <br />from the previous mining activities". This statement. gener•ai.es a <br />r_oncern regarding whether there is sufficient topsoil material <br />remaining within the proposed affected area to achieve successful <br />revegetation of the site to tl~e proposed post-mining land use. Tt <br />would be beneficial to have some approximation of both the size of <br />the area(s) devoid of topsoil due to historic mining activities and <br />the average depth and resulting quantities of topsoil avF~ilable for <br />salvage from remaining undisturbed areas. If sufficient quantities <br />of topsoil are not available to ensure successful revegetation, <br />then it may be nef_essary to incorporate some type of soil <br />amendments into the reclamation plan. Please edclress this concern. <br />Additionally, the application states that "Topsoil m~ be salvaged <br />from a portion of the permit as the pit is expanded in the <br />3 <br />